Isekai de Skill wo Kaitai Shitara Cheat na Yome ga Zoushoku Shimashita: Gainen Kousa no Structure - Vol. 3 Ch. 12

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
2,563
4492248.jpg
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
951
what kinda greedy f***wit thinks something along the lines of "well, the nobles guild can't be touched but it doesn't do shit anyways and the commoner's guild uses up too much of the funds I'm embezzling so let's just shut it down and f*** all if the result is hoards of monsters roaming and destroying everything cause now no one bothers to track or hunt them. they're just commoners it's not like they'll realize what I've done and rebel, what do you think this is? 18th century France."?
(obviously they'd replace 18th c France with the appropriate isekai history event/s, but you get the idea, yea?)
cause I'm guessing there's a ~98.9% chance that's what happened
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
3,134
Logical reasoning is so strange, clearly only the MC could possibly possess such a majestic thought process....
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,296
@gaigous
Kinda weird the characters questioned how come the author-avatar knew what had to be done, in order to progress through the plot the author wrote for them. It felt like the author was having a conversation with himself about his poor writing skills, derp.

@InsaneInsomniac
As far as we know, maybe the noble-guild will start hiring commoners directly, instead of having to dump work on another agency that will then dump work upon these commoners.
"These commoners don't need to be represented by a guild, they just need to work for us. That's good enough for them." -- I bet that's the author's line of thinking for douchebag nobles. Frankly, the mere fact that the kingdom allows for commoners to arm themselves, and be unionized -- is already an insane notion for any ruler of such age. The monopoly on force is a very basic concept when it comes to unifying lands.
And the funny thing is, from the MC's point of view, he has very little reasons to care. It's a power struggle between two groups, he was already considering jumping ship as he joined, anyway.
 
Active member
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
373
this is the first time i see an isekai story about the adventure guild getting shut down.

I mean, all the adventure guild in isekai(if exist) usually have no problem about anything, be it the power as a massive organization.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
3,134
@Solipsist I think I lost several brain cells listening to the MC(author) drone on about the process of elimination, but when the priestess(author) had the absolute gall to call that way of thinking strange.....I don't think I've ever felt so disgusted or patronized before.
 
Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2018
Messages
127
@NeetGod me too, this is the first time I see a guild shut down... normally in fantasy isekai the guild is a single organization and is for this reason that they work without too much problems but in this case we have two guilds where the commoner one was doing its own business while the noble one was just messing around and creating problem to the commoner because in fantasy most of the nobles think of themself as the superior ones.

If the author didn't do that division then is quite difficult for a guild to close
 
Contributor
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
7,488
Wait,
is this manga going to be the prequel to the "D-Rank Adventurer" manga, where the MC gets the "Hero's Sword" that gets stronger the more he gets laid?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,009
@Yautja no I didn't mean in this one, didn't notice his belt until you mentioned it, I meant some other thing that was based on "our" modern world, where the protagonist just had a regular belt hung askew, for no discernible reason. In this one it looks okay, the guy's pants (or waist skirt), are split down the middle, and the two belts are holding it together in pant-shape, probably also has the sword held between the two belts. I guess in this isekai, they don't make the oversized sword belts, that double as WWE championship belts, so the MC had to double up. Though, I suppose the other option could be that he makes his clothes more complicated, with every slave he gets, so they can make themselves useful when he has to get dressed, or go to the bathroom, with two belts it probably requires both of his girls' help to take a leak.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
979
@HDMI1,
Nope, not even remotely the same. Besides Nagi got rid of the pervert skill when he reconstructed the girl/sword's skill.
 
Member
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
263
Im mostly annoyed of their exploration failiure. What about statue vs arcitacture smash?? Comeon.
 
Active member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
364
>I didnt even think about such logic
>hence no one should be capable to comes out with xxxx logic
>hence the author is bla bla bla is a hack
Did you repeat this thought process when you read detective stories, novel or manga?
retard.
And thats why youre just a shameless leech reader and not an author.👺
 
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
102
@Yautja
Actually I don't believe that belt is a 'belt', but is in fact a shoulder strap holster being improperly worn. Which would explain why it looks like he has two belts on and why his sword is awkwardly positioned in such a way as to inconvenience every other citizen. Seriously, imagine all the people he bumps into and all the things he knocks over, because of wearing his sword horizontally instead of vertically, like some generic JRPG douche.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
18,286
@Solipsist Uh, no. Widespread disarming of citizens is a somewhat modern concept. In ye olde times every (free) household would have a spear, bow, crossbow, shied, some armour if they were wealthy and lucky, etc. Or course at least an axe since you'd need an axe to chop wood and meat anyway. If nothing else, everybody would carry a knife, the most useful of tools, which could also serve as a weapon. A gentleman would carry a sword. A sword would be an unnecessarily big expense for a commoner, though, because metal was expensive and a spear would be more efficient anyway. Men were regularly drafted into service in the endless wars of the period, and it often took the form of a household needing to supply the local lord with a soldier. A significant estate would need to provide a man-at-arms with a horse, usually in exchange for a tax break. The majority of the population in the old times lived outside of big cities, and they needed to be able to defend themselves against reasonable threats like robbers or beasts. At the end of the day it was also a sign of a free man to carry a weapon.

What comes to unions... Well, it was common for the laws to dictate that a person needs to belong to a guild in order to have a certain profession. If the guild didn't accept you for whatever reason, then that's it. In practice you needed to work as an apprentice of a master first, and then pass some exams. Free competition for the benefit of consumers wasn't a thing back then. If the professionals felt like there was too much competition so that their profits were going down, they complained to the king (or a more local lord) and consequently something was done to reduce competition. So, unions were a thing, after a fashion.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,296
@Kaarme
I can certainly believe that ye olde commoners were properly armed. I can take that back. The union thing is a bit surprising, to say the least, but the rest isn't all that surprising if I try to use a bit of imagination.
Either way, what I really meant to say about "unions and arming commoners", is that the notion of an "adventurer's guild" is quite odd. It is more often than not a group that essentially nurtures up commoners, to have a lot of personal might, so much in fact, to the point they do not even need protection from their lords or kings. Some stories even have the guild serve as an actual army for the kingdom, since the nobles and royalty can't amass the same level of authority, which is definitely a strange sight.

What I wrote about "monopoly on force", though, can be argued. As you said, lots of wars. Lots, lots of wars. But I don't think it's a wild thought to have, that these wars ended once someone "unifies the lands", and all authority to shed blood and police goes to the victor.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top