Looks like another example of source readers spoiler baiters huh.
People who read ahead, who can't stfu and have to throw hints, try to force expectations onto others.
Why don't you all just stfu and let people read the chapter and make up their own opinions without your "source" knowledge.
Also funny cause manga is adapting the LN and not the WN which is not the same. WN are usually first drafts and cannot be relied to predicting what happens when teh LN gets released. Good example would be TenSura and Tenken which both added, removed, and changed somewhat major plot points, events and characters in the LN compared to the WN.
Reports that the source material
SUCKS do not constitute spoilers. After all, some idiots will love crap, and other idiots will hate the best possible stuff. Absolutely no one is
forced to investigate just why some people say that the source material
SUCKS.
And
none of those reporting that the source material
SUCKS have insisted that the manga will necessarily follow the source in
SUCKing, and some have expressed hope that it will not.
So, then, setting aside that you are white-knighting so ineptly, why are you doing it at all? Surely you don't want readers who might otherwise get a rude shock (if the source is followed) not to be forewarned and thus better prepared for that possibility.