Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2021
- Messages
- 685
two for one
Last edited:
Jimoto no Ijimekko-tachi ni Shikaeshi Shiyou to Shitara, Betsu no Tatakai ga Hajimatta. - Ch. 44.1 - The battle for the drawing class has begun.
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2019
- Messages
- 996
Another one to the Kotaro Harem.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2019
- Messages
- 248
I wish to destroy that twink
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2020
- Messages
- 233
Came here to say the very same thing. Really messes with the flow of the dialogue.
trashadokai and by continuation crappabeast have always been colossal incorrigible retards in that area no matter who's the TS of the week. I don't think I have ever seen a release of theirs that didn't have at least one of those brainfarts. It's like that trash skill of his is contagious and he infects any and every TS who joins or substitutes. Either that, or he just keeps finding the TS with the worst allergy to dictionaries out there.
Not just how often they break, but also where.
Seriously?
Nothing short of percussive therapy would help at this point. Or nuke that whole site and their Discord from orbit. Useless wankers, the lot.
Last edited:
How is it gay for a man to be attracted to feminine physical cues?
Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2024
- Messages
- 26
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2023
- Messages
- 2,383
We learned about his identity early-on, only to get confused when he teased Kotaro later.
It's been 40+ chapters. It needs to come to an end.
If for some reason this series goes in that direction and the sister calls him her 'brother' because of that ... Yeah, I'm dropping this by that point.
Power Uploader
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2023
- Messages
- 1,677
I rarely say this, but if someone better snipes this I wouldn’t mind.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 280
If it's enough for you to not mind what you find downstairs then yeah it's pretty gay, dude has been aware that he's dealing with a lad for a while. If you get trapped well shit happens, if you pursue the trap then...
Meh, that'd be, uh, one male cue against how many female ones? I'm sure there'd be instances where this works the other way round, too.
It's just an organ, a collection of nerves in one of two statistically likely shapes of an erogenous zone and some box-ticking bodily functions. If people have such fragile sexualities that that's enough to make them lose their shit, I can only pity them. After all, there's still a whole person attached to that meat. If I didn't care for that I could just spend a few minutes on the hub to shake a wanksock/-stick at and be done with it.
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 280
I don't know what to tell you, whether someone is a guy or girl matters in nearly all cases of attraction. Very few people in the world will not care what set of junk is downstairs, an infinitesimal amount of people on a global scale.
If it doesn't matter for you that's cool, we have the labels of gay, straight, bi, pan etc. to classify how people think about these things. Which is why I said dude is bi, if he keeps pursuing bro-nee-san despite clearly knowing he's a guy. Most likely though, it's just a gag.
That's a lot of assertions in one post. I'm not saying any of this can't be observed in the field, but it's still quite a daring pile of reckless blanket statements unduly suitable for self-perpetuation.
"We have the labels" Yes, "we" do. And that's the problem with labels. Not only are they hopelessly reductive and incomplete just to be able to function as labels in the first place. You can't wrap something in a handful of labels and hope to be able to paint even a remotely accurate picture. They are also insidiously inviting, promising easy and convenient communication of certain concepts. Which makes them horrendously unreliable. You have hardly any reliable source to check what they mean and what they don't mean; you can't trust that anyone else using them is using the same source, or is using the source in full agreement or maybe just in the parts they understand or know of. All of which makes them so easy to get political with. Labels get taken for full representativity. Categorization becomes rigid and prone to disagreement simply how it crystallized out of some shaky, unverifiable hearsay.
Just take this exchange. I questioned how the appreciation of and attraction to different-sex cues (in a same-sex human or otherwise) could be considered gay when gay is (ostensibly) understood as appreciation of and attraction to same-sex cues. (Is it not?) "You like slim hips and round faces? Go for it, dude. Oh, by the way, it has a dick, you're a fag." Such kind of goalpost-moving way of arguing couldn't ever be taken seriously. It contradicts itself within the span of as little as two sentences. I wonder what label one would slap on that …
So, Kotaro bi? Hardly, I say. It's cute things he finds attractive, or at least recognizes as such. Not biologically manly things. Remember that manga, too, uses simplification and exaggeration somewhat similar to classic theater play. To "qualify" as a bi manga character, Mizuki would probably need to look more like that stereotypical buff black dude in drag, not like a Takarazuka bishi.
Nah. If you do use labels, it's important not to forget that they can't possibly paint the full picture and that they are necessarily limited in what they can reliably represent. Unless everyone is aware of that, you can't hope to have a meaningful discussion about this.
Last edited:
skill issue I've gotten so used to dogshit translations and typesetting that this is golden
Similar threads
