Kabeyaku Nado Fuyou to Tsuihousareta S-kyuu Boukensha, <Dorei Kaihou> Skill wo Kushi shite Shijou Saikyou no Kunizukuri - Vol. 2 Ch. 7

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Messages
300
Finally the dwarf/gnome slave, but just a glimpse one the last page. :cry:

Anyways, thanks for the chapter.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
983
There it is the loli character and we even get a bit of underboob
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
677
Thanks for the chapter, JPEG Scans.



Tsk. Why does there always have to be a loli?
Thanks for the chapter!

Because there's no barrier to entry for lolicon. No matter the story, whether it's lighthearted like this one with art to match (and ESPECIALLY if it features a girl like Ellie as a romantic option), or it's dark, gritty, and bloody, you can find a loli there.

That's the first reason. The second reason is also the cause of the first: authors like this one are frequently pedophiles or at least bear pedophilic tendencies, enthusiastic about sharing their fetish with the world in a way that has so far flown almost completely under the radar.

if they sexualize the child im dropping this shit so fast

Too late: by definition, a loli is a sexualized little girl. What else is the difference between such a girl and a "loli"? (Never mind the circumstances of her first appearance in the story.) If you have a little girl in skimpy clothes, it's only for one reason; if you have a little girl as a romantic interest/companion, it's the same.

What's funny is that it is probably fake outrage too.

They complain so much, because it is a reflection of what they browse on r34.

So they don't hate it because it's loli, they hate it because their mind fills with all the r34 loli they looked up.

This is straight out of the '90s LGBT playbook: accuse the opponents of your lifestyle of secretly participating in it. Makes a lot of sense, really, all things considered.

I suppose it has never occurred to you that this depraved fetish (one you at least advocate for) exists in more than just superabundance in JP media--and that while "lolicons" love it what it is, the rest of the world doesn't, and they're finally catching on because it's become just that flagrant after so many years.



This thread reeks of Sankaku Complex--the kind of people who think everything beyond nearly sheer verticality constitutes "balloon tits"; the type of people who think their fetish is normal--and everyone else is absurd for thinking otherwise. All we're missing are the lolicons pretending to be victims of society and that lolicon isn't actually pedophilia. lol All while...

loli acquired. FBI watchlist spot also acquired.

...they wink and nod to each other about what they're into. Comedy.

At this point, I myself am only here for Ellie, the designated second fiddle girl (look at her competition; being a childhood friend, she'd almost certainly be romantic dead meat if this wasn't a harem). Still, this chapter takes the manga one step closer to being dropped: I, like many others, knew that pedobait was advertised from the gate; but I, unlike the pedophiles, didn't fixate anticipatorily on it--and tried to focus on the story itself. This is part of why people are voicing their disgust: because no matter what manga you read, as long as it's as I described above, you almost certainly will run into this particular fetish--no matter how much you aren't thinking about that fetish at all, and are just focusing on the story.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 13, 2023
Messages
416
...they wink and nod to each other about what they're into. Comedy.

At this point, I myself am only here for Ellie, the designated second fiddle girl (look at her competition; being a childhood friend, she'd almost certainly be romantic dead meat if this wasn't a harem). Still, this chapter takes the manga one step closer to being dropped: I, like many others, knew that pedobait was advertised from the gate; but I, unlike the pedophiles, didn't fixate anticipatorily on it--and tried to focus on the story itself. This is part of why people are voicing their disgust: because no matter what manga you read, as long as it's as I described above, you almost certainly will run into this particular fetish--no matter how much you aren't thinking about that fetish at all, and are just focusing on the story.
Brother... it was a joke... she ain't even an actual loli... Just petite....


And leave pedo for when it's actually the extreme shit that is pedo. Not for simply smoll.

The overuse is desensitizing it, and making it less extreme than it is... which I find concerning.

If you need a reminder pedo is pre-puberty, i.e. literally a child. Not 1 day under the AOC like many treat it as (illegal tho it may be, not pedo), or an age gap.

Keep it for when it should be used. Like for DIddy, Epstein, that tranny from Mr Beast. Not for Dr Disrespect (although the memes are funny), since it needs to be said, saying Dr D isn't a pedophile, isn't defending what he did... the fact this has too be specified shows the lack of intelligence most have.

ironic though how people were jumping on Dr D as a pedo... but then went eerily silent when it came out the tranny from Mr Beast is an actual pedo, committed actual crimes, and is also a groomer... Ironic. (Dr D did something morally wrong, not legally wrong... well for the state he was in at least).

But I digress. Not a rant btw, I just ramble.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2024
Messages
43
These developments are way too fast... Elf girl likes him way too immediately, now we soon will get a lol-dwarf who's probably gonna swoon all over MC. Why don't give at least 5-6 chapters of actual bonding first
.
There's another Manga where this dude has this Restoration skill and he "repaired" two broken slaves. That one too has developments going on quick but it's actually better and it makes sense. Also both of those girls don't immediately went to "imma sleep with im" right after he just freed them..

Ahh making Manga is hard huh. I'll stick around for now..
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
677
Brother... it was a joke... she ain't even an actual loli... Just petite....


And leave pedo for when it's actually the extreme shit that is pedo. Not for simply smoll.

The overuse is desensitizing it, and making it less extreme than it is... which I find concerning.

If you need a reminder pedo is pre-puberty, i.e. literally a child. Not 1 day under the AOC like many treat it as (illegal tho it may be, not pedo), or an age gap.

Keep it for when it should be used. Like for DIddy, Epstein, that tranny from Mr Beast. Not for Dr Disrespect (although the memes are funny), since it needs to be said, saying Dr D isn't a pedophile, isn't defending what he did... the fact this has too be specified shows the lack of intelligence most have.

ironic though how people were jumping on Dr D as a pedo... but then went eerily silent when it came out the tranny from Mr Beast is an actual pedo, committed actual crimes, and is also a groomer... Ironic. (Dr D did something morally wrong, not legally wrong... well for the state he was in at least).

But I digress. Not a rant btw, I just ramble.

:|
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
9,718
Thanks for the chapter, JPEG Scans.





Because there's no barrier to entry for lolicon. No matter the story, whether it's lighthearted like this one with art to match (and ESPECIALLY if it features a girl like Ellie as a romantic option), or it's dark, gritty, and bloody, you can find a loli there.

That's the first reason. The second reason is also the cause of the first: authors like this one are frequently pedophiles or at least bear pedophilic tendencies, enthusiastic about sharing their fetish with the world in a way that has so far flown almost completely under the radar.



Too late: by definition, a loli is a sexualized little girl. What else is the difference between such a girl and a "loli"? (Never mind the circumstances of her first appearance in the story.) If you have a little girl in skimpy clothes, it's only for one reason; if you have a little girl as a romantic interest/companion, it's the same.



This is straight out of the '90s LGBT playbook: accuse the opponents of your lifestyle of secretly participating in it. Makes a lot of sense, really, all things considered.

I suppose it has never occurred to you that this depraved fetish (one you at least advocate for) exists in more than just superabundance in JP media--and that while "lolicons" love it what it is, the rest of the world doesn't, and they're finally catching on because it's become just that flagrant after so many years.



This thread reeks of Sankaku Complex--the kind of people who think everything beyond nearly sheer verticality constitutes "balloon tits"; the type of people who think their fetish is normal--and everyone else is absurd for thinking otherwise. All we're missing are the lolicons pretending to be victims of society and that lolicon isn't actually pedophilia. lol All while...



...they wink and nod to each other about what they're into. Comedy.

At this point, I myself am only here for Ellie, the designated second fiddle girl (look at her competition; being a childhood friend, she'd almost certainly be romantic dead meat if this wasn't a harem). Still, this chapter takes the manga one step closer to being dropped: I, like many others, knew that pedobait was advertised from the gate; but I, unlike the pedophiles, didn't fixate anticipatorily on it--and tried to focus on the story itself. This is part of why people are voicing their disgust: because no matter what manga you read, as long as it's as I described above, you almost certainly will run into this particular fetish--no matter how much you aren't thinking about that fetish at all, and are just focusing on the story.
But to dine with Snakes Cock complex means uh you actually join their boonfest party


You yourself are telling us, "ah welcome fellow bombers!"

Enjoy the teats!
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
677
But to dine with Snakes Cock complex means uh you actually join their boonfest party


You yourself are telling us, "ah welcome fellow bombers!"

Enjoy the teats!

How would just seeing what they say constitute "dining" with them? On top of that, how could my implied--but completely overt--contempt for their ways amount to the same?

As for what you're saying I've said--I've said nothing other than what you saw above; it looks like you've read into my words and contrived a false interpretation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top