Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
- Messages
- 3,542
@criver: Yepp, he is a villain. Totally concur. No room for discussions there. (Only for nitpicking about what a "anti-hero" and a villain are in a dramaturgical way. Still he has become a bad person. The end.)
Your also right about "an eye for an eye" being a barbaric policy, but it is also a very fundamental part of our sense of justice. Surly it is on the level of a primitive instinct, but that's also the reason most people understand that concept and it works as an deterrent for the most part. (Sometimes some people do believe they can't be caught/capital punishment can't come for them (It is simply impossible in their minds, like a teenage train surfer can't really realize the possibility of dying.) or they don't care. In those cases it might not work.) Also, as it is like an instinct, it is satiable. Sometimes there is not enough revenge, but the cruel truth is, it does fill your stomach to a certain degree. Sometimes to the point you can move on.
Nevertheless, redemption and rehabilitation are the superior ways of handling things in societies, which can afford them, but even those have a down side. In some cases they don't work.
The setting of this story is a primitive cruel world, and here is where I might deviate from your (valid) opinion. Maybe I can share my POV with you: She is a dangerous being and would kill again, if left alone. That society isn't strong enough for R'n'R. And even if it would be, she is so mentally ill, she would have to be locked away for the rest of her life. Her death due to the absence of alternatives is the way to save more lives. (Well, the MC could memory heal her, but...he is a villain, who has been hurt, so he won't.)
What I don't get is why he told her about his circumstances. What if she has been bugged? Or she somehow escapes? He could have had his revenge, even without telling her about his personal reasons. ...Maybe so he can get his fill, but it's still stupid.
Your also right about "an eye for an eye" being a barbaric policy, but it is also a very fundamental part of our sense of justice. Surly it is on the level of a primitive instinct, but that's also the reason most people understand that concept and it works as an deterrent for the most part. (Sometimes some people do believe they can't be caught/capital punishment can't come for them (It is simply impossible in their minds, like a teenage train surfer can't really realize the possibility of dying.) or they don't care. In those cases it might not work.) Also, as it is like an instinct, it is satiable. Sometimes there is not enough revenge, but the cruel truth is, it does fill your stomach to a certain degree. Sometimes to the point you can move on.
Nevertheless, redemption and rehabilitation are the superior ways of handling things in societies, which can afford them, but even those have a down side. In some cases they don't work.
The setting of this story is a primitive cruel world, and here is where I might deviate from your (valid) opinion. Maybe I can share my POV with you: She is a dangerous being and would kill again, if left alone. That society isn't strong enough for R'n'R. And even if it would be, she is so mentally ill, she would have to be locked away for the rest of her life. Her death due to the absence of alternatives is the way to save more lives. (Well, the MC could memory heal her, but...he is a villain, who has been hurt, so he won't.)
What I don't get is why he told her about his circumstances. What if she has been bugged? Or she somehow escapes? He could have had his revenge, even without telling her about his personal reasons. ...Maybe so he can get his fill, but it's still stupid.