If this sort of stuff is ok, then supporters shouldn't bat an eyelid when this material is not enough to satisfy a pedo who intends to harm children.
This is a non sequitur.
In fact, if it doesn't satisfy a pedophile that intends to harm children, that's proof positive that it doesn't encourage pedophilia, because the pedophile didn't have enough of a response to it to the point that they still decided to harm real children despite the functionally infinite supply/accessibility/legality of loli/shota drawings.
Using depictions of pedophilia can also fuel someone's desires and normalize it.
If you actually believed that, you wouldn't restrict this reasoning to loli/shota, but extend it to depictions of all kinds of wrongdoing like violence and crime. But we both understand how incorrect it would be to assert the latter. Additionally, we don't think that producers of media depicting such things should be held responsible for people committing such things in real life, not least of all because 1) you couldn't prove the connection, 2) we trust individuals to not be so unilaterally influenced by media that they'd think the behavior fit to do
in societies that starkly condemn it, and 3) individuals normally
are capable of recognizing what's fit and unfit to do and won't think it good just because they saw it in media.
Furthermore, you'd have to eliminate the physical and psychological concepts of childhood to starve pedophilic desire. More than being attracted to children, they're not attracted to children in the same way we're attracted to adults. They fixate on what makes real children, real children-- their lack of body development, their innocence, their manipulability, et cetera. In general, they desire the corruption of childhood innocence. That is, continuing to live in polite society, where there are children, fuels their desire. This all happens, even as our societies specially condemn child sexual abuse.
The contrast is palpable when you see the primary viewership of media that involves "onee/shota". It's primarily boys and men who actively lust over the
"onee-san", and-- if anything-- desire to
be the "shota" in that circumstance, because they envy the character's position. Not because they have any attraction to the "shota". In somesuch works, the "shota" is even given adult-like agency or even adult-like physical features.
This isn't something that
could encourage pedophilic urges, even putting aside the sadistic aspect of pedophilia.
If nothing else, law enforcement doesn't see it the way you do. They don't bust down doors over lolicon-- they do it over real CP, and they normally hardly find lolicon among the
terabytes of CP that their arrestees compulsively amassed. In America, the FBI warns people to not send tips over lolicon, presumably unless they can demonstrate the drawing is identical to a real person that exists.
You're not advocating for the protection of children, and your actions are contradictory. You frequent a site you think hosts material that people should get arrested for viewing, while additionally implying that you viewed the material yourself. Contrarily, all you want for the manga is for it to be axed.
