Kawai-san wa Saigomade Shitai! - Vol. 1 Ch. 1

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 25, 2023
Messages
1,277
Again, technically not considering everything but nips are censored. If it was uncensored at any point then yes.
So by that logic, if a porn video blurs out the genitals, it's no longer porn? That's a completely retarded take.

The defining factor of porn is the intent and explicit nature of the content, not whether a few pixels are censored.

Censorship doesn’t change the fact that it's sexually explicit material.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 16, 2024
Messages
421
So by that logic, if a porn video blurs out the genitals, it's no longer porn? That's a completely retarded take.

The defining factor of porn is the intent and explicit nature of the content, not whether a few pixels are censored.

Censorship doesn’t change the fact that it's sexually explicit material.
Either way, there are mangas out there being WAY more explicit than this (e.g. Parallel paradise) and they‘re still not even labeled as pornographic.
Man you can‘t even see the men‘s genitals or the girls. So this ain‘t NOTHING compared to other works here. This thing being labeled as erotica is completly Valid
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 25, 2023
Messages
1,277
Either way, there are mangas out there being WAY more explicit than this (e.g. Parallel paradise) and they‘re still not even labeled as pornographic.
Man you can‘t even see the men‘s genitals or the girls. So this ain‘t NOTHING compared to other works here. This thing being labeled as erotica is completly Valid
Just because other mangas are more explicit and not labeled as porn doesn’t mean this one is labeled wrong.
Different publishers and platforms have different rules.
If something is heavily sexual, even without full nudity, it can still be classified as porn.

I jockingly said it was at first, but seeing how it made coomers mad I beg to reiterate my point: it was porn
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 16, 2024
Messages
421
Just because other mangas are more explicit and not labeled as porn doesn’t mean this one is labeled wrong.
Different publishers and platforms have different rules.
If something is heavily sexual, even without full nudity, it can still be classified as porn.

I jockingly said it was at first, but seeing how it made coomers mad I beg to reiterate my point: it was porn
Actually to be specific, if the manga isn‘t published in a p-magazine publisher, then it‘s lowkey not even pornographic. It still counts as erotica

I mean, you wouldn‘t Call Vagabond or Beserk porn just because they have some scenes yk. There is still a difference. Porn and erotica are whole different things.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top