Hoo, so you're only focused on the modern era
No, and I can't even imagine what abortion of logic could have led you to believe that.
If a country doesn't focus on wars, it will be easily conquered by its neighbors.
You don't have to
start wars to defend yourself from invasion, nitwit.
Stop trying to be edgy, stupid.
Says the dumbass screaming "war is good ackshually". I don't think you even know the meaning of the word.
Calling arguments as fallacious is overused
If your arguments are getting called "fallacious" a lot, it might be because you suck at basic logic in a very obvious way.
as they seem to think claiming any arguments they don't like as such will automatically make them win.
You could have just
said "I don't understand how
argumentum ad populum doesn't prove anything", you didn't
have to reject the very concept of logic. (Oh, who am I kidding, you did that before the conversation even started.)
I might as well invoke the fallacy fallacy to even the stupidity.
I mean, misapplying a fallacy in response to one being used correctly could hardly make your argument worse than it already
is. Nothing else you've said has any basis in reality, why would I expect you to start now?
Ask a Medieval peasant on his views on war, and he'll support it, because it gives him the chance to go up the social ladder, even if the chance of it happening is extremely rare, and a sizable loot.
"An illiterate medieval peasant would say it's good because he's wildly misinformed about his chances of survival and expected rewards" is a contender for the
absolute dumbest argument I've ever heard someone make. Congratulations.
Call me whatever names you want
Bitch, you literally started it. Like my grandpa always said, don't let your mouth write a check your ass can't cash.
but you can't call me wrong, you weak willed prick.
I can, and I am,
because you are, you dweeb. Role-playing as a tough guy on the internet only proves how insecure you are. (Sort of like whining about name-calling after doing it yourself, or
leaving harassing messages on someone's profile after they block you. That's some real terminally-online loser behavior.) You can
call me a dick, but at least I
have one.
And I suppose I have to make it clear that I was mocking you
Are you
genuinely so stupid that you didn't understand that I was mocking you
back? Holy shit.
Your "muh science!" is more often than not intertwined with war, doofus. Just like how there can be no shadow without a light source, there can be no scientific advancement without war funding.
"I don't understand that correlation ≠ causation!" Really proving that "fallacious" isn't the default setting on your brain there, buddy. And like, holy fuck, you think private universities and research institutes don't exist? Or even just that military research occurs
regardless of whether there's a war on? You understand less about the world than most small children.
You do realize governments fetishize wars as a masculine trait to recruit or conscript more soldiers, right?
Yes, and they also specifically target uneducated and dim-witted people because they're the most likely to fall for it. So thanks for self-identifying as a member of that group.
What, is the US now a fascist state?
It's certainly trying. You should read some actual history instead of deriving your entire worldview from fantasy. Maybe read up on how
the nazis took inspiration from the deep south, or how
modern "patriot" groups are literally using the same iconography as the italian fascists, or how
there's been an undercurrent of fascism in politics here for over 80 years, or how
the military's always been at the center of it. Just demonstrate
some awareness of the world around you, any at all, before the next time you feel the need to open your mouth.
Your arguments are literally all based on morality... sUbJeCtIvE!
Oh no, I made moral arguments in a discussion about the "value" of war.
Which is itself a subjective concept. How dare I actually stay on topic, I should have followed your lead and spent a paragraph shitting my pants and projecting because I don't understand when my own wordplay is turned back on me. Now the sky is falling.
Instead of arguing people on the Internet over morality, why don't you improve your English?
And there's that projection again. If you can't even understand that "understood" ≠ "agreed with", you
definitely don't have any room to criticize anyone else's English. Like, good lord, did you even read your own first paragraph? You wouldn't know grammar if you were hit upside the head with a textbook. I mean, come on:
And there's a high possibility of the cities being destroyed with its discoveries in tomes, like what happened in history. You do realize the techs we're using now are based from military technologies, right?
That's not even intelligible. I can't even imagine what what point you think you're making.
So I can take that as you being wrong, naive and stupid?
Clearly, nobody can
stop you from intentionally misunderstanding everything you read, any more than they can stop you from projecting your own personality deficits on everyone else. "People don't want to listen to the inane shit that comes out of my mouth, that must mean
they're the stupid ones!" is the sort of thing only a person without the barest shred of self-awareness would say.
But I bet you hear
that a lot, too.
?
