The church's guys aren't the baddies, neither are babylons'Church was the core of evil all along? /surprised pikachu face
The church arming the refugees to use them as their private army aren't the bad guys?The church's guys aren't the baddies, neither are babylons'
Pretty sure Rose being a refugee who works as a hitman for Babylon makes this a grey conflict, and also I don't think what Babylon did to Gina's family has been explained yet so neither side can really be confirmed as a "good guy"The church arming the refugees to use them as their private army aren't the bad guys?
i'm not saying they are the good guys, just that here, in this situation, the church is being way worsePretty sure Rose being a refugee who works as a hitman for Babylon makes this a grey conflict, and also I don't think what Babylon did to Gina's family has been explained yet so neither side can really be confirmed as a "good guy"
I don't think you can really say that for sure either though. Is an armed ring of an uprising against an oppressive government effectively enslaving them worse than an assassin organization that kills anyone who gets too uppity in the name of maintaining stability and hopefully allowing soft change long term? Possibly yes! But we don't have a wide enough view of the domestic and international politics to really get in-depth on that one.i'm not saying they are the good guys, just that here, in this situation, the church is being way worse
More like effectively impossible. Even in the US there are only two smokeless powder plants in existence, it's hard. Black powder can be done but that's a very different weapon system. Primers and powder would have to be smuggled in, probably brass too. That said, it's much easier to do that then weapons. I'm now spacing on whether there has been any mention of drugs in the refugee area, but if so they've got a path right there, and powder should actually be easier than a lot of them. If nothing else that seems like something the church could manage in a variety of ways.Yes, you can cast the bullets, but making brass from scratch, getting primers and powder is going to be difficult.
the political situation doesn't matter, there's a massive difference between pro spies military trained/vet and a bunch of refugees crafting weapons to overthrow or at least contest a country they don't belong toI don't think you can really say that for sure either though. Is an armed ring of an uprising against an oppressive government effectively enslaving them worse than an assassin organization that kills anyone who gets too uppity in the name of maintaining stability and hopefully allowing soft change long term? Possibly yes! But we don't have a wide enough view of the domestic and international politics to really get in-depth on that one.
You're right there is a difference, employed professionals engaging in extra-judicial killing is worse. Refugees invited in as de facto slave labor, given minimal to no rights/protections and zero representation despite international treaties and basic decency, and kept as a perpetual underclass even as they have children there is a thing that happens even today and it's wrong. Take a quick read on foreign workers in Dubai for example, because I get the feeling the author certainly has researched some of this in coming up with their fictional setting. Claiming that none of that would matter is wild. America didn't end slavery via peaceful campaign but via war and violence. The civil rights movement that took the painfully long delayed next step depended heavily on peaceful protest and civil disobedience to the finish line, but threats of force and armed self-defense were a critical part at the beginning in opening up space for that and reducing anti-black violence. Robert Williams was a key figure there.the political situation doesn't matter, there's a massive difference between pro spies military trained/vet and a bunch of refugees crafting weapons to overthrow or at least contest a country they don't belong to
i guess our backgrounds are too different to understand each other properly on those mattersYou're right there is a difference, employed professionals engaging in extra-judicial killing is worse. Refugees invited in as de facto slave labor, given minimal to no rights/protections and zero representation despite international treaties and basic decency, and kept as a perpetual underclass even as they have children there is a thing that happens even today and it's wrong. Take a quick read on foreign workers in Dubai for example, because I get the feeling the author certainly has researched some of this in coming up with their fictional setting. Claiming that none of that would matter is wild. America didn't end slavery via peaceful campaign but via war and violence. The civil rights movement that took the painfully long delayed next step depended heavily on peaceful protest and civil disobedience to the finish line, but threats of force and armed self-defense were a critical part at the beginning in opening up space for that and reducing anti-black violence. Robert Williams was a key figure there.
Of course, going to force raises the stakes period and can easily backfire in a variety of ways from multiple ends of the spectrum. Even in a democracy any major bad incidents committed (or false flags that become more plausible even) could poison a public coming around and promote backlash. On the opposite side a brutal authoritarian state might just firebomb the whole island or useful brutal force to crush it. But a blanket statement that extra judicial assassination to keep a lid is better than some credible threat of force as part of a big movement doesn't strike me as justified.