Majime Tennen-kei Reijou wa Toshishita Ouji no Omoi ni Kidzukanai - Ch. 11
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Group Leader
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Messages
- 4,257
You know the answer.... but you decide not to explain it for no reason..... yup, great way to solve the problem.
Just tell her that he's actually attracted... and tell her that her outfit being revealing made things hard because he's not able to have sex with her yet.....
There is literally no reason to keep this sh*t hidden other than to drag out the drama between them.....
Just tell her everything... you don't always need to keep f***ing secrets...
Just tell her that he's actually attracted... and tell her that her outfit being revealing made things hard because he's not able to have sex with her yet.....
There is literally no reason to keep this sh*t hidden other than to drag out the drama between them.....
Just tell her everything... you don't always need to keep f***ing secrets...
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2019
- Messages
- 284
I can already tell that guy at the end is the designated love rival, but could we just not do that? They were starting to make progress again.
Group Leader
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
- Messages
- 678
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2018
- Messages
- 6,375
seems like someone is courting death, because he can't see mount tai...
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2019
- Messages
- 683
love raul, guiding them even tho hes not experienced it himself, what a lad
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2020
- Messages
- 401
Guess who'll be the future prime minister...
Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2019
- Messages
- 65
I don't think the prince even has any knowledge of sex beyond the fact that it's a thing that exist. Since he never goes out I doubt he can come accros anything sexual and the books that he reads are most likely clean beyond the brief mention of it,maybe not even that.
Group Leader
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Messages
- 4,257
Well, it's a good time to tell him....
Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- Messages
- 295
Just want to point out for the umpteenth time that "choosing" or "appointing" a successor is globally a rarity and completely unknown to Europe (because it means you have a constant succession crisis — which is obviously a very bad idea).
Those few societies which did maintain such customs, especially when their population was high, always suffered from constant problems (such as unstable governments/dynasties — those Chinese dynasties which did have the ruler choose their successor were far less stable and shorter lived than those whose order of succession was predetermined).
Since neither the Japanese nor Koreans ever did this (at least, not after their prehistoric periods), I can't help but wince when I see them so often applying such customs to European-ambient settings (Europe likewise having never had such practices, as far as the historical record goes). It also means that practically the only political conflict in these things is a type of succession crisis unknown to the Western world… Cringe-worthy indeed.
The closest things one actually sees in Western history, are when the present monarch has no living legitimate progeny to succeed them (the Romans usually addressed this with adoption of a close relative; this had its own problems, resulting in European monarchies and nobility from the early Middle Ages on going purely by predetermined order, always defined as being within the bloodline, although clarifying said order sufficiently to remove all seeds of conflict took much longer), partible inheritance (which sometimes included legitimized bastard children; the division of the inheritance nearly always results in the heirs fighting amongst eachother for the rest or the inheritance eventually becoming absurdly small — these problems leading to the custom's general abandonment), and elective monarchies (these never allow the input of the present ruler).
Those few societies which did maintain such customs, especially when their population was high, always suffered from constant problems (such as unstable governments/dynasties — those Chinese dynasties which did have the ruler choose their successor were far less stable and shorter lived than those whose order of succession was predetermined).
Since neither the Japanese nor Koreans ever did this (at least, not after their prehistoric periods), I can't help but wince when I see them so often applying such customs to European-ambient settings (Europe likewise having never had such practices, as far as the historical record goes). It also means that practically the only political conflict in these things is a type of succession crisis unknown to the Western world… Cringe-worthy indeed.
The closest things one actually sees in Western history, are when the present monarch has no living legitimate progeny to succeed them (the Romans usually addressed this with adoption of a close relative; this had its own problems, resulting in European monarchies and nobility from the early Middle Ages on going purely by predetermined order, always defined as being within the bloodline, although clarifying said order sufficiently to remove all seeds of conflict took much longer), partible inheritance (which sometimes included legitimized bastard children; the division of the inheritance nearly always results in the heirs fighting amongst eachother for the rest or the inheritance eventually becoming absurdly small — these problems leading to the custom's general abandonment), and elective monarchies (these never allow the input of the present ruler).
Similar threads
