You seem to misunderstand: my argument is not that you're wrong. You might be right, only time and chapters will tell. What I'm saying is that at this time you are merely speculating with very little circumstantial evidence to show for it. That itself is fine, but then you use that speculation to speculate about another thing, namely the power of an ability we know nothing about, other than that it allows to see otherworldy beings. Given the earlier explanation that said beings are fluid in how they are perceived, there's not even any reason to think there is any difference between her father's sight and hers. This is what I'm pointing out.