nice whataboutism. i don’t even have to entertain your remark. however, you’re going to claim that i’m dodging it if i don’t. the difference is, i’m not suppressing your right to drool over incest, a fundamentally broken attraction that is morally bad in both a utilitarian and deontological sense. the most logical progression from the end of such a relationship is the birth of a child with significantly reduced generic diversity, leading to much higher susceptibility to genetic diseases. this inbreeding was the reason behind the death of the last population of wooly mammoths on a secluded island. moreover, it is evil to bring a child into the world knowing that you are going to make the life of this child hell socially and biologically. beyond that, the relationship is fundamentally beyond flawed since there is a massive power imbalance no matter what, not to mention in this case one party is still a minor.
therefore, there is a massive difference between a relationship composed of consenting lgbtq adults and a harmful relationship between a “father” and its child daughter, this difference being power imbalance and consent. thereby disproving your nonsensical whataboutism comparison.
to answer your question as to what separates me from the supposed fascists i brought up—while i never brought up those people, i have only ever talked about the empire of japan, this is your faulty reasoning trying to drudge up a way to discredit me—the difference is that i’m not passing legislation banning incest, i am not forming think tanks to form plans to disenfranchise incest likers, nor am i forming a hate group to go around harassing and doxxing and lynching these drooling cowards behind a screen who cheer on and help to normalize a broken relationship dynamic that exists in the real world and hurts many real children.
i am already giving you far more respect than you deserve by spending my time responding to your bullshit, please make the best of the rest of your life