Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2018
- Messages
- 4,094
I still can't believe itHahahahahaha Chapter 3 def controversial, hopefuly its all up from here
must be a record, fastest fall from grace I've ever seen
I still can't believe itHahahahahaha Chapter 3 def controversial, hopefuly its all up from here
No, NTR doesn't mean cuckoldry. It comes from the word 'netoru' (to steal) and 'netorare' is when you're subjected to said stealing. All that's required for something to fall under NTR is the feeling of someone being stolen, regardless of relationship status. There's a bit more nuance to it and no actual 1:1 equivalent so people still use the term NTR instead of cuckoldry.Everyone's calling it NTR bait. My guys. NTR would mean the protagonist and heroine were already going out. Stop calling it NTR bait. Wtf.
NTR, or how I view it, is when one of the Lovers, BF/GF, Husband/Wife, a "canon" relationship is disrupted and broken by way of one of the lovers being seduced by a 3rd party. If we're going based on hard definitions, NTR means Cuckoldry, which technically only applies with a husband/wife relationship (Dictionary says when Wife is unfaithful to husband).
From the perspective of the MC? Yes.Is it NTR if the two are romantically interested in each other, but they never go out and one of them ends up changing their love interest? Does "Might as well be going out" count for my personal bias of "canon" relationship? Uh.... idk.
This isn't a big deal. There's plenty of cute and wholesome series to go around. I wouldn't eat a pizza with a roach leg on just one pepperoni. I understand why people would drop it and move on.You're literally going to miss out on the rest of the series of cute and wholesome because of one scene.
You can't have your 'relationship' stolen if there's no 'relationship' in the first placeAll that's required for something to fall under NTR is the feeling of someone being stolen, regardless of relationship status
I literally just said "regardless of relationship status" and you're still going on about relationships.You can't have your 'relationship' stolen if there's no 'relationship' in the first place
I looked up the image on google images, chose an image and right clicked, selected "open image in new tab", then copied the link and put the link into the insert image thing.Can you teach me how to post an image like this? I've tried but mine came out like shit
Thank for letting me know. Multiple google search is telling me "Infidelity" and "Cuckoldry" so, honestly, my personal mentality is still on the "established relationship" side. So despite your attempted explanation, I'm still unable to see the scene in question as NTR. I If I read more NTR I'd probably "get" that it's more broader. I refuse to read the genre though.No, NTR doesn't mean cuckoldry. It comes from the word 'netoru' (to steal) and 'netorare' is when you're subjected to said stealing. All that's required for something to fall under NTR is the feeling of someone being stolen, regardless of relationship status. There's a bit more nuance to it and no actual 1:1 equivalent so people still use the term NTR instead of cuckoldry.
From that one page in the chapter. I agree. Heroine Face makes it look sexually implied. I had to double take the scene to find out that the MC was imagining himself in Vampires position. The inside of the SFX Text changes hair color. While it didn't match Yutaka's White Hair, I thought it was the shaded variant for effect. The author intended for the scene to be lewd. He HARD fucked up on delivering the delusion aspect though.This isn't about you or anyone in particular, but I'd like to add: you'd have to live under a rock to not see the sexual implications of him feeding on her neck. It's one of the most overused vampire tropes that exist. The author knows what they were doing.
We call em, TwittardsThis manga should come with a entry gate with a sign on it:
MUST HAVE AN IQ OVER ROOM TEMPERATURE IN ORDER TO READ. OTHERWISE F**K OFF TWITTER TARD
That is purely based on your opinion and interpretation of what an NTR should be. That's not what an NTR is. You can't claim it's NTR when the ship hasn't even sailed. That's like saying it's cheating for your crush to date with someone else when she is just your friend. Do you see how silly your statement is? You're trying to say as if you're justified to say you, personally, have been "NTR-ed" because your crush is on a date with someone, when you're not in a relationship. That's NOT how it works. You can't lose something you don't have. You do NOT include "opportunity". Oh, I am robbed of money. Look, that candidate #745 got hired for the job I'm applying. Absolutely buffon.I literally just said "regardless of relationship status" and you're still going on about relationships.
If you could just read the sentence you quoted properly, you'd understand what I meant by "feeling of being stolen" and realize that the opportunity or "lead" being "stolen" is enough. Whether or not it really was stolen doesn't matter because the genre itself plays off of the MC's possessiveness/entitlement, for lack of a better word. Technicalities and concrete relationships aren't as important.
Besides, they do have an established "relationship."
At this point, the MC is FeMC's closest friend in school, has introduced him to her family, and they've even shared the FeMC's cultural greeting, which caused her to blush. Her siblings even start thinking there's more between them than just friendship. They build that up and then the chapter immediately after, the vampire gigolo she initially wanted nothing to do with one-ups the MC by sucking her neck. The author even, albeit poorly, shows the MC imagining he's getting cucked.
You're free to like it, hate it, or straight up not care about it, but I don't know how anyone can argue that it's not NTR bait.
That means nothing. You can't claim your girl friend (not to be confused with girlfriend) as a cheater when you are her 'best friend', and you happen to have visited her house with her families being inside. You can't claim that she's a cheater when you, one day, tried dusting off her hair from a visible dust speck, and you see her blushing.At this point, the MC is FeMC's closest friend in school, has introduced him to her family, and they've even shared the FeMC's cultural greeting, which caused her to blush
Because it is not. You're labelling things inappropriately. It's like you're being called anything-ist for disagreeing with the mainstream narrative. Use a term properly, lest it loses its meaning.how anyone can argue that it's not NTR bait
we get it you love NTRBecause it is not. You're labelling things inappropriately. It's like you're being called anything-ist for disagreeing with the mainstream narrative. Use a term properly, lest it loses its meaning.
There are far too many entries in the genre that say otherwise. How about you do a quick tag search on any appropriate website for NTR and see for yourself? Here, I'll even pick one out for you.That is purely based on your opinion and interpretation of what an NTR should be. That's not what an NTR is.
Yeah, in this case the author doesn't commit and the incident is treated as a nothingburger in-universe, so it just falls under NTR-baiting rather than full-blown NTR. Regardless, a move like this after two chapters of establishing itself as a fluffy romcom just feels misplaced and in poor taste to me.Thank for letting me know. Multiple google search is telling me "Infidelity" and "Cuckoldry" so, honestly, my personal mentality is still on the "established relationship" side. So despite your attempted explanation, I'm still unable to see the scene in question as NTR. I If I read more NTR I'd probably "get" that it's more broader. I refuse to read the genre though.