Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2018
- Messages
- 8,092
@kindaguy we know we are talking about drawing skills here, well at first we were shitposting, then yesterday i had to stop joking.
@Yautja it is a 2D drawing to translate it onto 3D you will need an entire different set of tools, counting heads no longer helps you for that, and the comparison is pretty much impossible, because just from the basics, deep is made in this case (for a 2D drawing) by shadowing, volume is an illusion is not a product of solid geometry, and this drawing doesn't has any of that, it is a flat drawing, that's a valid critique to be made of the drawing, but it doesn't means she is deformed for having no shadowing, so to extrapolate it onto a 3D field there are a lot of things missing here, a lot.
Unlike the 3D idea, her arms and legs, that we can measure using the very tools given to us by the drawing itself, and indeed she has about half a head thinner arms than she should, does that break the drawing? no. Why if it is a mistake? because not even you who didn't like the drawing noticed that, until recently you were instead focusing on her tits and ass which do have an appropriate measurement.
The first picture is of a fit woman and is used to illustrate how head count is used for measurement, and i already explained how it should be adapted for wider bodies, but i digress, because the first drawing specifically illustrates how to measure height, you would need another head schematic to talk about shoulder hip ratio, which that drawing doesn't shows.
Because those are not units of measurement, it is nonsense, it is talking out of your ass and it proves nothing at all, and the 3D is on the same boat is forced bullshit, which is why i had to leave the memes aside, because you just went too far on the department of basic common knowledge, i don't think it should be right for me to keep memeing it up after finding out that you really didn't knew how that work.
@Yautja it is a 2D drawing to translate it onto 3D you will need an entire different set of tools, counting heads no longer helps you for that, and the comparison is pretty much impossible, because just from the basics, deep is made in this case (for a 2D drawing) by shadowing, volume is an illusion is not a product of solid geometry, and this drawing doesn't has any of that, it is a flat drawing, that's a valid critique to be made of the drawing, but it doesn't means she is deformed for having no shadowing, so to extrapolate it onto a 3D field there are a lot of things missing here, a lot.
Unlike the 3D idea, her arms and legs, that we can measure using the very tools given to us by the drawing itself, and indeed she has about half a head thinner arms than she should, does that break the drawing? no. Why if it is a mistake? because not even you who didn't like the drawing noticed that, until recently you were instead focusing on her tits and ass which do have an appropriate measurement.
The first picture is of a fit woman and is used to illustrate how head count is used for measurement, and i already explained how it should be adapted for wider bodies, but i digress, because the first drawing specifically illustrates how to measure height, you would need another head schematic to talk about shoulder hip ratio, which that drawing doesn't shows.
Because those are not units of measurement, it is nonsense, it is talking out of your ass and it proves nothing at all, and the 3D is on the same boat is forced bullshit, which is why i had to leave the memes aside, because you just went too far on the department of basic common knowledge, i don't think it should be right for me to keep memeing it up after finding out that you really didn't knew how that work.