With a few notable exceptions, random death for no reason other than "just because, lol" seems to be a staple of Japanese horror. Someone a while ago once explained to me that it was a cultural thing.I really question what is supposed to be interesting about "Oh, someone randomly does this death curse without telling the afflicted anything and the afflicted dies because he only found out about the rules way too late"
Yeah, totally - I think that’s kind of the point though. In a lot of J-horror, there’s no moral logic to the curse. You don’t "earn" it, it just happens. That unpredictability makes it scarier for me than the usual "punishment for a mistake" approach.With a few notable exceptions, random death for no reason other than "just because, lol" seems to be a staple of Japanese horror. Someone a while ago once explained to me that it was a cultural thing.
I think it goes back to Japanese feudal times (or even before) where folks would suffer all manner of famines, plagues, and other seemingly natural disasters. It's human nature to always look for logic or order in chaos especially when the results are so devastating so the idea of local gods and youkai and curses were devised to lay blame on for the cruel seemingly-random realities of ancient life. This traditional approach to the supernatural extends to their portrayals in modern times as in this chapter (thanks for the TL).Yeah, totally - I think that’s kind of the point though. In a lot of J-horror, there’s no moral logic to the curse. You don’t "earn" it, it just happens. That unpredictability makes it scarier for me than the usual "punishment for a mistake" approach.
Yes exactly! It's a kind of fatalism that’s rooted in Shinto-Buddhist cosmology where spirits, nature, and death coexist without clear hierarchy or fairness.And this is why I sleep with my saving stuffed under my mattress... /s
Also, theoretically if the guy never spent the money would he live forever?
I think it goes back to Japanese feudal times (or even before) where folks would suffer all manner of famines, plagues, and other seemingly natural disasters. It's human nature to always look for logic or order in chaos especially when the results are so devastating so the idea of local gods and youkai and curses were devised to lay blame on for the cruel seemingly-random realities of ancient life. This traditional approach to the supernatural extends to their portrayals in modern times as in this chapter (thanks for the TL).
It's a very careful balance that needs to be struck with such an element of randomness. You make it feel too random, and the story ceases to be horror and instead becomes nonsensical. Imagine a story that goes like:Yes exactly! It's a kind of fatalism that’s rooted in Shinto-Buddhist cosmology where spirits, nature, and death coexist without clear hierarchy or fairness.
I like it when the horror comes from realizing there’s no human logic to cling to. It’s the same reason why so many J-horror protagonists die even after doing everything "right" - cleansing rituals, apologies, whatever. You can’t negotiate with the supernatural - you just collide with it (e.g. tech-age stories like Ringu or Chakushin Ari take that same structure: no villain, no sin, just inevitability. The curse becomes a mirror for powerlessness in modern society.)
I'm obviously a sucker for J-horror... felt like I need to defend it at times
It's a very careful balance that needs to be struck with such an element of randomness. You make it feel too random, and the story ceases to be horror and instead becomes nonsensical. Imagine a story that goes like:
"One day Steve woke up a little late. He had breakfast, grabbed his coat, and left his apartment. He went to the corner store, picked up a bag of chips, and exploded into bloody chunks with the force of a hand grenade. It turns out Steve's ancestor in 1812 had unknowingly run over a spider with the wheel of his horse-drawn carriage. However, that spider was actually a minor god of spiders, and it had cursed his family to explode in 77,777 days like it had. This was unavoidable fate. The end."
There is no human logic here, just something that was set in stone and there was nothing Steve could have done. Just an inevitable death. Despite meeting the criteria, It feels like a bad story because it relies on a "gotcha."
It's also a thing with individual culture of horror. American horror, the protagonist is an individualist and tries to fight the horror. European horror, the protagonist tries to use his knowledge of history and legacy to evade the horror. Japanese horror, the protagonist dies to the horror because he is a replaceable cog. So this can factor into the perspective one takes into the story as well. An American will ask why he didn't fight. The European will ask why he didn't try to escape. The Japanese will ask why you won't accept your lot.
Thing is, even Western Horror can be like this. Stephen King, an author that some would call a master of horror stories, sometimes delved into this style of horror with imo great effect. One story I remember he wrote basically was about a dude who one day found a moving finger sticking out of his sink, and he tries to unsuccessfully deal with it in multiple ways, with the story ending with him basically defeated.It's a very careful balance that needs to be struck with such an element of randomness. You make it feel too random, and the story ceases to be horror and instead becomes nonsensical. Imagine a story that goes like:
"One day Steve woke up a little late. He had breakfast, grabbed his coat, and left his apartment. He went to the corner store, picked up a bag of chips, and exploded into bloody chunks with the force of a hand grenade. It turns out Steve's ancestor in 1812 had unknowingly run over a spider with the wheel of his horse-drawn carriage. However, that spider was actually a minor god of spiders, and it had cursed his family to explode in 77,777 days like it had. This was unavoidable fate. The end."
There is no human logic here, just something that was set in stone and there was nothing Steve could have done. Just an inevitable death. Despite meeting the criteria, It feels like a bad story because it relies on a "gotcha."
It's also a thing with individual culture of horror. American horror, the protagonist is an individualist and tries to fight the horror. European horror, the protagonist tries to use his knowledge of history and legacy to evade the horror. Japanese horror, the protagonist dies to the horror because he is a replaceable cog. So this can factor into the perspective one takes into the story as well. An American will ask why he didn't fight. The European will ask why he didn't try to escape. The Japanese will ask why you won't accept your lot.
GOOD post spira do more like thisAbsolutely great distinction. Though some of the best J-horror walks that line intentionally. It’s not about why it happens, but about how the characters process something they can’t reason their way out of.
Western horror usually externalizes the threat - you fight it, outsmart it, or at least understand it. Japanese horror, by contrast, turns inward. It’s about psychological collapse when logic fails. That’s why stories like Ju-On or Noroi linger - the characters’ attempts to rationalize the curse only make the horror more real, not solvable.
In a Western lens, "giving up" feels like weakness. In a Japanese lens, it’s often enlightenment or inevitability. The horror isn’t that you died - it’s that you realized you never had control to begin with.