Blackmail is neither respectful nor considerate.
Forcing someone into discomfort and pushing through their hesitation is bad, actually.
So what? "Your love won't come true anyway" is not a reason to sexually harass someone, nor is it one to force them into another relationship.
You clearly don't care one single bit about what Seula wants or how she feels about the situation, you just want Daum to score so you come up with excuses to justify assault and deception.
Lol, what blackmail? I like how some of you Seula stans like to conveniently overlook how Seula exercised horrible judgement in initiating sexual activity with Daun (willful ignorance is never a good look on anyone). Thus, initiating this chain of events.
Second, Seula is not some innocent maiden here. If she was the beacon of virtuosity that many of you make her out to be, she would have womaned up and took responsibility for her actions to the other party. Instead, she choose to go on this delusional path of cowardice by hiding what she had done instead of owning it in front of Areum. Daun, simply gave her
some options and Seula, a grown adult,
chose this one. Nothing was stopping her making another choice—telling Areum herself.
Third, I have no reply to your second statement, other than me thinks the lady(?) doth project too much, and doesn't warrant a rebuttal, since your claim was never explicitly stated by Daun.
Fourth, you are right, Seula hasn't really given me much reason to root for her, given how her immature decision making directly started this whole sordid affair. And even if I entertain your perspective—as in Daun was blackmailing Seula, thus forcing her to stick around, how do you justify their second sexual encounter,
after Daun explicitly stated that she no longer had to deal with her and that she would not tell her sister, on top of her being sober? The day after Seula is then shown
choosing to engage in subsequent contact with Daun, which implies consent. Simply put, your reasoning does not hold up to scrutiny...
It sounds like what alot of the Seula crowd wants to do is simply dismiss Seula's behavior as an "innocent drunken mistake." However, if that is true, then one must also equally dismiss other sexual encounters initiated by drunken perpetrators as "innocent drunken mistakes" thus nullifying accountability. So my dear, are you sure that
this is the hill you want to die on??