Otomege Sekai wa Mob ni Kibishii Sekai desu - Ch. 64 - Reality of the Kingdom

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
353
Like i said, if the event didnt end like that ill take whatever punishment the author can think of, but it ends with unreasonable wholesomeness, so she deserve to end in wholesomeness as well, tho since its already end this way i would rather have her executed than her to be a slave.
Honestly regardless of how the situation ended I'm sick of fictional women getting close to zero punishment over the same 2 excuses: 1) Is cute 2) I was misguided.

I want to see a story where a cute misguided girl who did evil things gets actually punished for doing evil things.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2023
Messages
16
Honestly regardless of how the situation ended I'm sick of fictional women getting close to zero punishment over the same 2 excuses: 1) Is cute 2) I was misguided.

I want to see a story where a cute misguided girl who did evil things gets actually punished for doing evil things.
In other story i would probably agree with u, thats a fair treatment. But this story had some dark things in some aspect, so i at least expected this gal to be evil til the fight ends but all i got is disappointment.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
3,098
I thought the scene where we saw the king sits on a throne while the queen was standing up is a plothole, turns out the author already planned it.
 
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
5
This makes literally zero sense even without touching the misogyny intrinsic in this reasoning.
We saw that this world giant mechas and flying warships, war in this world has nothing to do with individual strength and switching control to women changes nothing, the only thing stopping them from sending soldiers to pillage the capital is the academy's indoctrination, which has nothing to do with gender
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
4,769
Okay, that was kinda a solid plan since men numbers were small and given relatively easy to have a mech or warship to get numbers even smaller, but seeing how absolutely brutal some matriarchal rulers or given opportunity women were even in our times (white knights ahoy!) it was bound to backfire...
 
Contributor
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Messages
5,307
Hmm? I guess to prevent some kind of revolution by the masses of unmarried women, the royal family basically promoted the fiction that women hold much of the power in the academies? Then they granted the wives of the feudal lords extra privileges, and it went out of control from there.

So they chose to culturally shift the power to women (a little, originally as a tactic) intending to weaken the ambitious and warlike feudal lords, not because women are less capable or incompetent, but because they're less warlike, less military power-hungry and are more likely to use their talents in non-military areas, reducing the military problems the royals have to deal with? But they overdid it, and the women started indulging in luxury instead.

I guess that explains the discrepancy on why women are supposedly powerful and society, matriarchal in their country, but for some reason it was still a kingdom ruled by a king! Also works to explain why the uppermost nobles like dukes and their families remained mostly patriarchal, like Ange's own family.

It was a royal conspiracy to centralize power towards the royals and away from the ambitious and more numerious lower ranked nobles who were a constant threat to their military power.

But certain things still don't line up. Like, if there were way fewer men in the kingdom, then I don't understand how they defeated the law of supply and demand and somehow make the men basically unwanted second class citizens, even as they'd normally be sought after by the many women who wanted to marry. You can't have reverse harems in societies with very few men and many women: the numbers simply don't work. Or does this demographic imbalance only apply to humans, and male demihuman slaves were brought in to fill the demand for the missing men?

Furthermore, maybe this also really only applies to noble society and the numerous commoners are not included. If so, then the statement "women hold all the power" and word "matriarchal" all turn out to be big lies by the royal family that they teach to noble children studying at the academy.

After all, most of the things we've seen so far are from the POV of a noble living in noble society. Maybe we're just seeing a microcosm of their world from Leon's POV.

But maybe a simpler explanation is that, the author realized the "women holding all the power" plot point got forgotten/wasn't consistently applied to the story, people pointed out that kings and dukes still held real power, and was thus forced to write this convoluted conspiracy to explain the discrepancies in the writing... Author, maybe:
Oopsie! I forgot society was supposed to be matriarchal, but wrote it happening in a kingdom ruled by a king, and wrote Angelica living under the power and protection of her actually powerful duke father instead of supposedly powerful duchess mother.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top