Ouritsu Mahou Gakuen no Saikasei - Ch. 2 - Buffalo

Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
72
This certainly gives me the eminence in shadow vibes
 
Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2020
Messages
156
Behold I present you edge lord teenager with a gun wait this is America
 
Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2020
Messages
49
Man doesnt use magic directly without a gun, looks edgy, has black hair, expressionless face.... now we are just missing the imouto and we have Shiiba Tatsuya in a fantasy world everyone
 
Active member
Joined
Feb 16, 2020
Messages
514
@ItzMuffins Whadya mean? This IS Tatsuya. His sister is just chillin in another room while Tatsuya is playing a VR game called “The Irregular...”
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Messages
19
Ok, this has been driving me crazy for seven movies now, and I know you're going to roll your eyes, but hear me out: Harry Potter should have carried a 1911. Here's why:

Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead. Basilisk? Let's see how tough it is when you shoot it with a .470 Nitro Express. Worried about its Medusa-gaze? Wear night vision goggles. The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it. Imagine how epic the first movie would be if Harry had put a breaching charge on the bathroom wall, flash-banged the hole, and then went in wearing NVGs and a Kevlar-weave stab-vest, carrying a SPAS-12.

And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal.

Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger? Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.

Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound.

I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series:

"Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1." And that is why Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2020
Messages
122
@nilan ay hear me out, you're definitely correct. see a guy who's tryna kill you? suddenly they're eating lead. but what about the entities that aren't solid. considering that it is a world of eldritch creatures why wouldn't there be something that negates bullets. something like a ghost for example. if there is magic that can instakill someone why can't there be magic that protects you from bullets? guns only work in this case if the enemy does not know of the fate. point is that the wizards will only die if they aren't skilled enough or they haven't prepared a spell that would protect them from lead.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top