English is terrible." They said there were about a total of six different coats of arms. "
" SIX?! " - " Isn't that 1 and a half more than last year? "
2 + ( 2 x 1.5 ) = 5
coats of arms.3 + ( 3 x 1.5 ) = 7.5
coats of arms.4 + ( 4 x 50% ) = 6
or 4 x 1.5 = 6
Actually, 1 and a half more would mean that there was 6-1.5 = 4.5, what you are describing is 1 and a half times more.English is terrible.
1.5 more than last year means you take last year's amount, then add 1.5 times as much.
So if they had 2 coats of arms last year, the math becomes2 + ( 2 x 1.5 ) = 5
coats of arms.
If they had 3 coats of arms, then it's3 + ( 3 x 1.5 ) = 7.5
coats of arms.
What you want to say is either, "50% more than last year." or "1 and a half as much as last year."
Then if you turn the sentence into math it's either4 + ( 4 x 50% ) = 6
or4 x 1.5 = 6
The reason I say English is terrible... is because a significant amount of native English speakers (at least in america) will make the exact same mistake. Since the people speaking are nobles I assume they would be smarter than me, and therefore would not make this mistake.
I came here to comment on both of these things. As written, some incompetent herald was carrying around half of a crest of arms.Actually, 1 and a half more would mean that there was 6-1.5 = 4.5, what you are describing is 1 and a half times more.
Critical distinction there - they are better educated than peasants of their time, not necessarily smarter. Their education probably also pales in comparison to a modern level. They'd still have certainly received elocution training and shouldn't be making this sort of mistake, but it's not inherently a mark of intellect.Since the people speaking are nobles I assume they would be smarter than me, and therefore would not make this mistake.
Actually, 1 and a half more would mean that there was 6-1.5 = 4.5, what you are describing is 1 and a half times more.
😑 It's a little ambiguous. The wording could mean there's 1.5 more "crests" than last year, or there's 1.5 more "army" than last year. Because of context, I chose to interpret it as 1.5 more army.I came here to comment on both of these things. As written, some incompetent herald was carrying around half of a crest of arms.
Yeah, that's specifically what I'm talking about.They'd still have certainly received elocution training and shouldn't be making this sort of mistake