Post your Castles, Cities, Forts and whatnot. I shall rate them.

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
Fantasy castles, cities, forts, and whatnot that are be passed off as settlements, are often depicted in the media we consume here on this very site. Now, often those so called cities are very excellently depicted and thus require someone of somewhat expertise to point out what is wrong at them. As there are so oft many, many things wrong with them. And this is where I shall enter the field. However, there are too many fantasy and/or historical series out there for me to view them all on my own. So please, would you kindly post those very cities/castles you come across at me in this thread, so that I can rate them.
Thank you.

The rating shall be settled on a 4-10 scale; 4 and below is a failing rate, so 5 is the bare minimal passing grade. There also will be -, +, ½ to represent 0,25 grading.

How do I rate this stuff
You can find examples here or here and rough explanation of how I rate cities/castles here

I will await your pickings of fortified positions eagerly, however, if your submission is just a "ringed wall city with a river running across it" don't expect much.
I will also rate your own designs, if you are the world/city building type.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
2,184
Fantasy castles, cities, forts, and whatnot that are be passed off as settlements, are often depicted in the media we consume here on this very site. Now, often those so called cities are very excellently depicted and thus require someone of somewhat expertise to point out what is wrong at them. As there are so oft many, many things wrong with them. And this is where I shall enter the field. However, there are too many fantasy and/or historical series out there for me to view them all on my own. So please, would you kindly post those very cities/castles you come across at me in this thread, so that I can rate them.
Thank you.

The rating shall be settled on a 4-10 scale; 4 and below is a failing rate, so 5 is the bare minimal passing grade. There also will be -, +, ½ to represent 0,25 grading.

How do I rate this stuff
You can find examples here or here and rough explanation of how I rate cities/castles here

I will await your pickings of fortified positions eagerly, however, if your submission is just a "ringed wall city with a river running across it" don't expect much.
I will also rate your own designs, if you are the world/city building type.
Funnily enough, my first thought was literally a settlement and not a city or a fort, because they're all so unremarkable in manga or manhwa (usually).
The mediums are always putting emphasis on the exterior and interior appearance of the cities, like they're supposed to be something grand and all, but they never talk about if they're practical and functional and why and when they should be so.

That's the major reason why they never leave me a lasting impression, except for ridiculously high walls (that's not a feature, literally anyone can copy-paste that setting without any sort of reason or esthetic to it) or copy-pasted assets of a certain type of castle, that just become bland and unremarkable at first sight in any comic you can find them in.

So unless the specific city configuration has a role to play in the writing of the plot (almost never), and it is showcased that way by the pacing, lore and drawing, then I'll just forget it as if it's just part of the decor (as it should be, considering most plot writings and developments just use it as decor and don't give it any lore).

Even in the world-building type of stories, the city layout is rarely a core component driving the story. It's just a plus you can mention, but that's it.

My first thought on a proposition I could have made:
https://mangadex.org/chapter/112ac21d-3f8b-46ac-897d-8a8e49e14c32/2
https://mangadex.org/chapter/278d828f-82c3-4f33-a52f-3faa0ed5ad5d/4
I mostly remember this settlement by the more advanced wall, but those parts I linked are enough to show what I was thinking of. It's a cry far from a city or castle lmao, but at least there's a meaning behind it's building.

My second thought I had, as I was laying out my reasoning:
https://mangadex.org/chapter/1b87e8da-c202-4b07-bbf0-87fec8260465/17
It's literally the main character's living quarters and front yard, which gets tons of development shown constantly as the story progresses. He fleshes out his house from the mountain bit by bit.
[spoiler next link (kinda spoiler, def. spoiler if you go next page)]
https://mangadex.org/chapter/210d3123-6853-4101-8928-ba84f2c11895/22
That's just the difference between how the actual city and his residence are presented; it's shown much less majestic and useful/practical.

Now, an example of something I know that might tick your boxes (although they're not really created based on realistic foundations):
I haven't read Aria yet but from some chapter comments on Colori Colore Creare (shared universe), I gathered it should be a pretty fitting recommendation on the topic (I'll read it when I have time).

(chronological order)
https://mangadex.org/chapter/1d80cd6b-7c66-4c5a-a2bf-36f6a301e727/30
https://mangadex.org/chapter/fffb8fc0-3fe3-4150-b3d9-ae35f5dda7ee/32
I won't share more pages because this manga is literally full of it; they're touring the city and making halts indoors, briefly turning the focus to the miscellaneous interior layouts.

Could you also post some of your iconic or favorite castle/cities showcases from manga so that I may know exactly what I'm missing out on? :02:
 
Last edited:
Supporter
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,702
What gets me about so many of the generic cities is they're just 'city on a river in a plain'. Not at the junction of two rivers, not at the edge of a change in terrain, not even at a significant bend in the river. Just pick a random point on a nondescript stretch of river and plop down a big walled city.

:facepalm:
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
But what is the rating for the generic ring walled capital city with a river running across it?
Depends
Generally speaking, it's not a bad design.
The city has a water access
the city most likely has just 2-3 entrances, but more than one
the ring wall has enough towers to support each other
the setting is something where the ring-wall makes sense

then it gets about 5-6

If it is say a series of rings that becomes a tower, then it would be interesting, but that isn't the "generic ring-wall river city"
3/10 at best imo.
Just because it's generic doesn't mean it's bad. I mean, visually it's bad and uninteresting, but in terms of defenses and such, it's a solid design. It passes, but just because it passes, doesn't mean it's good.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
What gets me about so many of the generic cities is they're just 'city on a river in a plain'. Not at the junction of two rivers, not at the edge of a change in terrain, not even at a significant bend in the river. Just pick a random point on a nondescript stretch of river and plop down a big walled city.

:facepalm:
To be fair, most cities are just that.
but that is why they are "most cities" and no one knows about them, except its inhabitants and the surrounding inhabitants.
Unless it got say "fire bombed into oblivion" in the last 100 odd years, no one will ever know about it.

But that isn't the point of fiction, especially when you spend resources to design it. If you are going to design a city, make it a "historical city" and not City A that was never heard, indeed.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
Funnily enough, my first thought was literally a settlement and not a city or a fort, because they're all so unremarkable in manga or manhwa (usually).
The mediums are always putting emphasis on the exterior and interior appearance of the cities, like they're supposed to be something grand and all, but they never talk about if they're practical and functional and why and when they should be so.

That's the major reason why they never leave me a lasting impression, except for ridiculously high walls (that's not a feature, literally anyone can copy-paste that setting without any sort of reason or esthetic to it) or copy-pasted assets of a certain type of castle, that just become bland and unremarkable at first sight in any comic you can find them in.

So unless the specific city configuration has a role to play in the writing of the plot (almost never), and it is showcased that way by the pacing, lore and drawing, then I'll just forget it as if it's just part of the decor (as it should be, considering most plot writings and developments just use it as decor and don't give it any lore).

Even in the world-building type of stories, the city layout is rarely a core component driving the story. It's just a plus you can mention, but that's it.

My first thought on a proposition I could have made:
https://mangadex.org/chapter/112ac21d-3f8b-46ac-897d-8a8e49e14c32/2
https://mangadex.org/chapter/278d828f-82c3-4f33-a52f-3faa0ed5ad5d/4
I mostly remember this settlement by the more advanced wall, but those parts I linked are enough to show what I was thinking of. It's a cry far from a city or castle lmao, but at least there's a meaning behind it's building.

My second thought I had, as I was laying out my reasoning:
https://mangadex.org/chapter/1b87e8da-c202-4b07-bbf0-87fec8260465/17
It's literally the main character's living quarters and front yard, which gets tons of development shown constantly as the story progresses. He fleshes out his house from the mountain bit by bit.
[spoiler next link (kinda spoiler, def. spoiler if you go next page)]
https://mangadex.org/chapter/210d3123-6853-4101-8928-ba84f2c11895/22
That's just the difference between how the actual city and his residence are presented; it's shown much less majestic and useful/practical.

Now, an example of something I know that might tick your boxes (although they're not really created based on realistic foundations):
I haven't read Aria yet but from some chapter comments on Colori Colore Creare (shared universe), I gathered it should be a pretty fitting recommendation on the topic (I'll read it when I have time).

(chronological order)
https://mangadex.org/chapter/1d80cd6b-7c66-4c5a-a2bf-36f6a301e727/30
https://mangadex.org/chapter/fffb8fc0-3fe3-4150-b3d9-ae35f5dda7ee/32
I won't share more pages because this manga is literally full of it; they're touring the city and making halts indoors, briefly turning the focus to the miscellaneous interior layouts.

Could you also post some of your iconic or favorite castle/cities showcases from manga so that I may know exactly what I'm missing out on? :02:
In the first two you have what we would call the foundations of a fortified city/castle, depending on how the community goes from there. A good read tho. Can't really rate that, since it hasn't gotten to the level of even a "large village yet"...

Then we get to... doesn't count.
I mean, I guess I'd have to rate someone's minecraft spire to pierce heavens, if that was something that existed in a fantasy series, built by a singular OP MC... but it isn't really an actual centre of living.

Then we get a river X-agon, that is on fire...
Jokes aside, it's
Depends
Generally speaking, it's not a bad design.
The city has a water access
the city most likely has just 2-3 entrances, but more than one
the ring wall has enough towers to support each other
the setting is something where the ring-wall makes sense

then it gets about 5-6

If it is say a series of rings that becomes a tower, then it would be interesting, but that isn't the "generic ring-wall river city"
And I shall leave it at that.

Venice would be an interesting thing to rate. As for Neo-Venezia on Aqua, I'd give it about 9 from the top of my memory from reading the manga several times and watching the anime even more times.
Still in terms of defenses, Venice is actually kinda bad, which is why they lived in the sea, surrounded by a swamp, which required a navy to tackle, which is why they had the largest navy in the Mediterraen. "Fleet is our Wooden Wall" t. English and all that jazz. Works quite well, I hear.

As for how defensible would the cities on Aqua be... well
They exist in space-age, so I'd have to rate their orbital defenses, anti-air defenses and so on. Once we hit modern age, it doesn't really matter what you build and where you build it. Be it floating cities or flying cities defying gravity, it's all moot, when someone lobs a square kilometre asteroid at you travelling relativistic speeds, nukes it from the orbit or the neighbouring continent or decides to bomb it to oblivion with 1000 bombing runs.

So uh.. overall score 0/10, please give me something to actually rate.

Not a manga, but here is a city design I pretty much give 10/10.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 28, 2023
Messages
471
What gets me about so many of the generic cities is they're just 'city on a river in a plain'. Not at the junction of two rivers, not at the edge of a change in terrain, not even at a significant bend in the river. Just pick a random point on a nondescript stretch of river and plop down a big walled city.

:facepalm:
Maybe it's because it's simpler to build on a "flat" terrain, which mean the river flow quite linearly and far from any river junction. Confluences are rarely "flat", except for the few ones "close to the ocean". And most of them are river mouths, where sediment despits can induce "rapid" variations of the river bed. Turbulent water, erosion, sediment deposit, all that.

Or because edges of terrain can move with time and break the house built upon. For example, some river erode their bed quite quickly, and move fast, in just a century. Notably, the bends in a river bed are often like that, because the currents are faster here. Thinks of meanders for the worst case.

We don't care now, because civil enginerring and building regulations made floods less problematic, but it was important back in the day.

And I don't see a problem with cities close to a river in a plain, given how rivers are usefull for early cities.

Also, Geology is fun !
 
Last edited:
Supporter
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,702
Having a source of fresh water is a plus - hence coastal cities at mouths of rivers, and inland cities along rivers or lakes, or springs if needed. But there's almost always some good reason the site was chosen. It was the narrowest point across the river, so a bridge was built there and a town grew up around it. It was a drop in the river, or a rapids, which allowed for a mill to be built. It was the junction of two waterways, so it made a logical point to transfer cargo traveling up/down river. It was a bluff overlooking the river, so it was tactically advantageous. It was a higher spot in a fertile flood plain. Hell, it could just be that the right person owned the land and decided to build there, though that strikes me as a more modern reason (think of all the cities that sprung up around railroads, and particularly railroad junctions, in the western USA). But there's some reason the founders chose that spot as opposed to someplace else, and 'this sure is a nice boring stretch of river' doesn't really strike me as a likely reason.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
But there's almost always some good reason the site was chosen
You'd be surprised how oft this isn't the case or if it was the case, the reason became moot a millennia ago.
First mistake is to think about cities in USA, they are all children, barely out of their diapers.

As a personal point. I live in a county called "Churchmoor", because someone had a bright idea to build a church on a swamp.
Thousand years later, people still live here. The church is also still here. 800 years old, though, not a thousand years old. The first one was a wooden church or sunk into the swamp.

Addition:
You'd be surprised how many cities bordering historical "Germanica" are Roman forts or baths, like Bath.

Also
0/10 there is not a city or castle in sight.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
Maybe it's because it's simpler to build on a "flat" terrain, which mean the river flow quite linearly and far from any river junction. Confluences are rarely "flat", except for the few ones "close to the ocean". And most of them are river mouths, where sediment despits can induce "rapid" variations of the river bed. Turbulent water, erosion, sediment deposit, all that.

Or because edges of terrain can move with time and break the house built upon. For example, some river erode their bed quite quickly, and move fast, in just a century. Notably, the bends in a river bed are often like that, because the currents are faster here. Thinks of meanders for the worst case.

We don't care now, because civil enginerring and building regulations made floods less problematic, but it was important back in the day.

And I don't see a problem with cities close to a river in a plain, given how rivers are usefull for early cities.

Also, Geology is fun !
0/10 there is no city or a castle
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
2,100
Since you've given an example of what you would give a score of 0/10 to, I'm curious if your score can drop below negative?
I mean, this settlement is the one that gave me a wtf moment when I saw it in recent memory
and usually I don't particularly care about these kinds of things.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
1,547
Since you've given an example of what you would give a score of 0/10 to, I'm curious if your score can drop below negative?
I mean, this settlement is the one that gave me a wtf moment when I saw it in recent memory
and usually I don't particularly care about these kinds of things.
It is a village in a caldera
why does it have walls?
I think the MC's face in that page matches mine 100%

Caldera village makes sense
but
why do you have WALLS WITHIN WALLS
and not in the good way, but in the "you added another canal inside your anus" kind of way.
Congratulations
this is indeed -1
Cause that wall took a lot of effort. They had to HAUL all of that wood inside the cauldera and then make it into walls.
Walls that serve zero purpose, because you can just bombard the WHOLE village from the top of the caldera.

What the fuck was the author thinking.
No
this is -2
Just because I am that fucking pissed off at the very idea of someone's idiotic mind potentially spawning this into existence in some multiversal madness of a world!
No, -3, just because I wrote this long of an answer it gets deduced another point. The only way this village gets a positive score is, if that volcano blows up an they all die!

The manga looks interesting, thanks for that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top