Rate/Review Scantilator Groups

[ichigoteguz]

I did not find this in the mega thread, so forgive me if it's already there, but similar to the rating you can give each manga entry, I'd like to be able to rate different scantilator groups, specifically because I've run into a group in particular which can be rather, sloppy?, sometimes, to the point where I often end up having to looking up the raws and using Google Translate from my phone because an important detail was either skipped, too heavily localized, or the text in the speech bubbles gets repeated twice, completely loosing a part of the conversation, I won't mention the group here since that is not the purpose of this post, but with group ratings or reviews things like these might improve. I know you can comment on the group page but that setup lacks the structure for proper constructive criticism, in my humble opinion.

 

[AccomplishedList1]

if i were scanlation group.. i'll absolutely will not agreed on this.. this what i call " selfish request " you can just ignore it if the quality not enough for you ?
what your right to judged scanlation group? they all give their time,money buy raw and effort no matter what quality it is..
you only reader if you want absolute perfect you can commision professional translator, or buy official support the author much better than rating this circle. as if you have right to criticised them ?

 

[totallynotmike]

I don't know what scantilator is, but it sounds dirty.

 

[Amizer]

You can just literally comment in the group comment, no need for such a useless button.

 

[Kinji]

It's a nice idea but can be rather demoralising to new scanlators who are trying to pick up the trade. Better to offer a more direct way of offering feedback than an arbitrary rating function that can easily be used to deny a group's contribution regardless of whether it is a legitimate concern or not. I would stand with you, but not in terms of a rating function.
Not to mention that ratings will not help to increase quality at all since it offers little to no constructive feedback.