Dude, it's okay, you are free to like or dislike whatever you want. Nobody asked you to switch shores, nobody demanded you to change identities, nobody requested you to denounce interests. There is space for everyone; no need to get so violently defensive from the mere acts of other people stating their preferences or interests, in jest or otherwise.
…
But since you so rabidly insist on jumping down the throats of anyone and everyone who does even so much as hint at any concept, notion, or idea you happen to perceive to be threatening your fragile sexuality, let me indulge you.
It literally said,
It literally did not say, "withered away her vagina and replaced it with a penis", "shrank her breasts to nothing", "dissolved her uterus and ovaries", "resized the proportions of her pelvis, ribcage, skullbone, jawbone, femur, etc. to match male anatomy", "rewired her neuron network", "recoded her XX chromosomes into XY ones", or "reindoctrinated herhimself with guns and bacon over shoes and gossip". (Silly stereotype for emphasis, I'm disappointed to see needed to be spelt out.)
No. All it said was that "she" (note the "her" in "herself") would gain (as in, receive in addition to existing faculties) a functionally usable penis. And if you're scared and afraid of a fleshy appendage (drawn and fictitious no less) whose only reason to be shaped like it is is to match its counterpart during intercourse that it co-evolved with, with the only notable, noteworthy, and relevant effects being an increase in anatomical versatility and the addition of a new erogenous zone, and not because it's what makes a man a man (because it's not; men have penises because they are men; men aren't men because they have penises; causality and shit, you know), I can only pity you.
You're what? "Pacific"? Dude, you can't even tell one word from another, and you're already trying to redefine them?
And it disagrees with you just because it has "boy" in the name? Are you really that fragile to feel threatened by a word introduced as early as the 16th century? What about "boyish"? Are you scared of that, too? What about "flamboyant"? Does that count? Must women be called "flamgirlant" now instead? Seriously, this is as baseless and artificial as refusing to spell "woman" because it has "man" in it. Words were created to be able to describe and communicate things. Words don't make things.
You know what Pacific means? It means, roughly, "the silent one". You should try this silent thing some, for as the saying goes, "it's better to remain silent and to let others suspect you an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."