@BanditHadron
I agree she can't bulldoze over Rasha but my original point is that she practically does nothing.
How come the Empress seems to have NO power, only responsibility.
She should be able to ban her from her own garden or at least area's where she is having business meetings ? JFC
which is what the whole debate on what she can and can't do started, so we are at square one ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Except for investigating why Rasha was in the middle of the Duchess fiasco she hasn't really done anything except verbal disagreements.
My expectation of her to simply take action in a small physical way isn't a bulldoze action ,imho. Putting Guards in her own garden [when their are political leaders present]
Is a fully reasonable and political justifiable reasoning. The Empress can just say its for their guest safety, and shame the Emperor for not protecting the guest properly if he complains.
Concubines only get real power after the successful birth of “male” children. So until she actually gives birth, and if it’s a boy she really doesn’t have powers. Also if the Empress or anyone else proves Trasha is a slave the child’s status even with noble blood will plummet significantly. I agree that it isn’t in the Empress personality to make a big deal of things, and she probably won’t be cruel to a child but the social system they live in would do a lot of the work for her. She can also just take the child away by adopting it and removing Rasha parental status. I believe Hatshepsut famously did to temper the other aristocrats who needed a male heir while she settled for being a regent before she took full power.