Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,823
@Greatninja3
No one is talking about bones, I am talking about what parts of an animal carnivores eat, funny how they usually start with entrails, necks or legs, all things left behind in this manga. Funny how all of those animals when killing in the wild don't swallow bones and usually start with the meat dense areas left behind in this manga. And these "dragons" are literally Velociraptors. Bipedel carnivorous lizards. And hey, we've had those in history, and have similar enough things today to know how or what they'd eat. So please do stop talking.
No, we both aren't. I'm pretty fucking right, and you're entirely wrong. You're bringing up a bunch of unrelated bullshit to try and distract from
A) The corpses are almost entirely uneaten.
B) There are like a dozen corpses
C) There are 50+ carnivorous animals who've seemingly not eaten those corpses
D) The corpses look mauled, and not eaten
E) The author tried to say they were desperate for food and had to eat bad parts when they've done the aforementioned and ignored plenty of good, meat dense parts.
All of which you've entirely ignored or tried to whataboutism away. It's impressive how many entirely substanceless comments you've written trying to ignore or dance around that obvious fact all to defend this manga from such a non-important criticism.
No one is talking about bones, I am talking about what parts of an animal carnivores eat, funny how they usually start with entrails, necks or legs, all things left behind in this manga. Funny how all of those animals when killing in the wild don't swallow bones and usually start with the meat dense areas left behind in this manga. And these "dragons" are literally Velociraptors. Bipedel carnivorous lizards. And hey, we've had those in history, and have similar enough things today to know how or what they'd eat. So please do stop talking.
No, we both aren't. I'm pretty fucking right, and you're entirely wrong. You're bringing up a bunch of unrelated bullshit to try and distract from
A) The corpses are almost entirely uneaten.
B) There are like a dozen corpses
C) There are 50+ carnivorous animals who've seemingly not eaten those corpses
D) The corpses look mauled, and not eaten
E) The author tried to say they were desperate for food and had to eat bad parts when they've done the aforementioned and ignored plenty of good, meat dense parts.
All of which you've entirely ignored or tried to whataboutism away. It's impressive how many entirely substanceless comments you've written trying to ignore or dance around that obvious fact all to defend this manga from such a non-important criticism.
