Sensitive Boy - Vol. 1 Ch. 1 - A "normal" boy

Active member
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
19
Very rarely, knowing spanish comes in handy:
The girl, in fact, didn't fix him
She has problems too. Her mother shelthered her all her life and labeled sexual topics as gross. When the MC told her about his trauma, she was moved to tears and felt trusted by the MC. But when she arrived home, because of her bias and lack of info on the matter, she couldn't handle it. The next day, she felt bad and grossed out when she realized that her parents and friends had sex at one point in their lives. Someone in the spanish fandom thinks she might have erotophobia.
Anyways, they're no longer together by chapter 16.
His friends? They're GOATS 🐐. Refer to chapter 19.
So is there another girl?
 
Aggregator gang
Joined
Jan 8, 2023
Messages
164
I was searching for this type of manga since i was old enough to understand what rape is and why is it always shrugged off if it happened with a boy
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Messages
656
That's fucked up.

However, I can't get enough of how wholesome the bond is with his two friends. They're never upset with him about his trauma, they're patient, considerate, and very protective (they both immediately rushed over to him as soon as they noticed something wasn't right). Those are true friends.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Messages
2,043
A dude got raped and drama is tame they said. Even if it is "tame" this is chapter 1. Let it prepare the ingredients, then it can start cooking. But I do hope rapist teacher came back later tho. It's gonna be all hands on deck in the kitchen and they chefs are cooking something SPICY when she appears.

After thinking a while, for maximum spiciness, what if the girl's mother turns out to be the rapist teacher? That's evil, but it'll juicy drama.
If I wrote this manga, I'd make the guy a raging misogynist with a lot of PTSD especially if people decided to treat him like an incel for being raped complete with society siding with his rapist because she's a woman. And trust me, I ain't pulling no punches.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 17, 2023
Messages
219
Well, It was just a shitpost with overkill, but since you replied in a civilized manner, I shall give a civilized reply too.
First of all, let's define rape: defined as to force someone to have sex when they are unwilling, using violence or threatening behaviour, all of the element operation of the sets.
Rape in it's nature is vile, because of the violence related to it, that's why women are more likely to be raped and suffers more damage psychologically and physically. Because of the power balance between the agressor and the victim. You can argue about that balance between the teacher and the student, but I'll explain why that doesn't matter in the great scheme of the sex balance.
We can not ignore the difference between the sexual psyche (not limited to sex) of the sexes, women by the reproduction nature is to give and the men is to take, or better put, to show his aptitude to have good children with her. I say "take" not literally, mind you. An example in the animal kingdom distinct than us humans are the birds: they sing, they dance and they fight other males to make the female to allow and award him with sex.

My arguments is the consequence of A->B != B->A (A = woman), (-> = sexually abusing), (B = men).

Now with the cards on the table, let's talk about the situation you presented.
In this situation, except when the male is not sexually developed, that is pre-puberty (not the case of our MC). The damage the man suffers will not be equal the damage a woman suffers as I specified above. In my situation, I surely would get mad, as you. But we would just get on with life, because we're not at a risk of bearing a child, unlike women, that has more risks in sex. We can talk about diseases, but it will just extend the discussion in a not meaningful way.
I comprehend that it is a very sensible matter.
I just made a the shitpost because of the exaggerated despiction by the author.
Conclusion, I'm not dog whistling that women who sexually abuses other men must be encouraged or supported. It just we can't put A->B in the same level of B->A.
Well said. Ignore the strikes and dumb emojies.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
587
From the flashback I can see the teacher on top of our mc. So unless she hit him to behave, I really don't know where the "it hurts" is coming from. Maybe if our boi was on his 5th round or smth, then it would make sense... After one hour it starts hurting from all that friction.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,593
It's the first time I see a manga with a theme that was really rare to talk about and people easily brush it off because it happened to a boy. They never take it seriously but, they didn't realize it left a scar for the victims.

Interesting.
 
Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2023
Messages
2
Well, It was just a shitpost with overkill, but since you replied in a civilized manner, I shall give a civilized reply too.
First of all, let's define rape: defined as to force someone to have sex when they are unwilling, using violence or threatening behaviour, all of the element operation of the sets.
Rape in it's nature is vile, because of the violence related to it, that's why women are more likely to be raped and suffers more damage psychologically and physically. Because of the power balance between the agressor and the victim. You can argue about that balance between the teacher and the student, but I'll explain why that doesn't matter in the great scheme of the sex balance.
We can not ignore the difference between the sexual psyche (not limited to sex) of the sexes, women by the reproduction nature is to give and the men is to take, or better put, to show his aptitude to have good children with her. I say "take" not literally, mind you. An example in the animal kingdom distinct than us humans are the birds: they sing, they dance and they fight other males to make the female to allow and award him with sex.

My arguments is the consequence of A->B != B->A (A = woman), (-> = sexually abusing), (B = men).

Now with the cards on the table, let's talk about the situation you presented.
In this situation, except when the male is not sexually developed, that is pre-puberty (not the case of our MC). The damage the man suffers will not be equal the damage a woman suffers as I specified above. In my situation, I surely would get mad, as you. But we would just get on with life, because we're not at a risk of bearing a child, unlike women, that has more risks in sex. We can talk about diseases, but it will just extend the discussion in a not meaningful way.
I comprehend that it is a very sensible matter.
I just made a the shitpost because of the exaggerated despiction by the author.
Conclusion, I'm not dog whistling that women who sexually abuses other men must be encouraged or supported. It just we can't put A->B in the same level of B->A.
Funny, you can use propositional logic symbol, but you don't understand what they actually mean.

In either case, your argument seems to simply boil down to what you perceive as "damage". So basically, you are quantifying it(let's say a function D that evaluates it) and then stating that(suppose that F is the set of 'female' and M is the set of 'male') that for any f E F and m E M, D(f) > D(m).

In other words, that the 'damage' received by any woman will be greater than the 'damage' received by any man.

We needed to organize your argument in the first place(as it's a mess), in order to disprove, as there is simply no way to disprove a spaghetti.

It's sufficient to show a single counter-example. As yourself have define, some rapes are realized through violence, in which case we can just show that there are damages done through violence which are greater. Such as supposed that as part of the rape, a woman(or a man) hits a man(or a woman) in the head with a brick, this causes a concussion and several neurological damage. The victim then suffer from the rest of their life. This is greater than the other risks you have outlined.

So basically, it would boil down to "how can you be so sure that your quantification of damage is actually true?", of which I am willing to bet that you can't. You have picked a couple of things, decided they are enough and run with it.

Want other examples of factors you haven't considered? Social stigmatization, child support, physiological damage, etc etc
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top