Supporter
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
- Messages
- 2,320
Spades?Bro... thats sad...
Lets just play Big Two, Chinese Poker, or anything that uses card, but vribbage
Spades?Bro... thats sad...
Lets just play Big Two, Chinese Poker, or anything that uses card, but vribbage
@Angry_PandaLike I mentioned before, we can play Mahjong with Mahjong Soul, it's free and those who don't know how to play can use it to learn.
@Angry_Panda
we need to set you up with teamspeak.
Had to google this, and no, I don't need another fucking interface. For work, I already have to use:@Angry_Panda
we need to set you up with teamspeak.
aight, we going be emailing mahjong then.Had to google this, and no, I don't need another fucking interface. For work, I already have to use:
Micro$oft Team$
Micro$oft $harepoint
Zoomer
Google MeatUp
Slacker
The VoIP phone on my desk
And the asshole sales guy texts me on my personal cell, because he is an asshole.
I refuse to add another one to the list. Like I've told my boss, just email me.
I've been watching a lot of commentary YouTube channels, and sometimes the subject of the videos involve people who like loli stuff. Now, the YouTubers generally condemn them like they're pedophiles, but I disagree. Maybe because I'm somewhat of an artist, I don't humanize fictional characters. They are just drawings. They're pieces of paper, with a bunch of lines on them that together may vaguely resemble people to human eyes depending on how good the art is. You could even argue that anime faces don't look human at all, and it's simply our brains being hardwired to find patterns that look like us. Like the face on mars.
Welcome to "there's flaming to every single loli title (even safe ones) because people who don't know what fiction is about need to copy&paste the same bullshit over and over". Just a note about how it is legislated in my country, there's a directive to the judges to only prosecute people that have, produce and/or share images that show real people as they are, which means only photographies, videos and the like (AI art is the only thing that was added because uses real models) can be considered pornography alone, so doesn't matter how erotic or realistic is a painting/drawing it won't be ever more than a fictional work. Like the UN, there's a bunch of people that instead of pointing out real problems waste time with these kind of things, they don't understand that what is dangerous in pornography is the loss of intimacy, dignity, privacy and the harm that the victim both has been exposed to and can be with the existance of that media. In other words, it's not about how "deviant" a consumer taste may become, it's about protecting those who appear in that media.I've been watching a lot of commentary YouTube channels, and sometimes the subject of the videos involve people who like loli stuff. Now, the YouTubers generally condemn them like they're pedophiles, but I disagree. Maybe because I'm somewhat of an artist, I don't humanize fictional characters. They are just drawings. They're pieces of paper, with a bunch of lines on them that together may vaguely resemble people to human eyes depending on how good the art is. You could even argue that anime faces don't look human at all, and it's simply our brains being hardwired to find patterns that look like us. Like the face on mars.
Yes, I thought I might get roasted for my comment. Bring it on guys.
Nah, it's not like you commented in a certain Suggestions' thread or something similar. The only ones that deserve it are those that won't say a thing if a shota/loli is brutally murdered but would be extremely offended if they appear topless or bottomless.Yes, I thought I might get roasted for my comment. Bring it on guys.