shitpost here

[Garett]

If the one who is of the female sex of the species homo (no homo) sapien is in possession of what is usually seen as the male of said species reproductive tube, which is more commonly known as 'the penis', will it be considered homosexual (no homo) which is commonly defined as the attraction towards those of the same sex as yourself to be attracted to such female without saying 'no homo'?

 

[hazzack]

If the one who is of the female sex of the species homo (no homo) sapien is in possession of what is usually seen as the male of said species reproductive tube, which is more commonly known as 'the penis', will it be considered homosexual (no homo) which is commonly defined as the attraction towards those of the same sex as yourself to be attracted to such female without saying 'no homo'?

translation: foota, say gex?

 

[Manko-sensei]

If the one who is of the female sex of the species homo (no homo) sapien is in possession of what is usually seen as the male of said species reproductive tube, which is more commonly known as 'the penis', will it be considered homosexual (no homo) which is commonly defined as the attraction towards those of the same sex as yourself to be attracted to such female without saying 'no homo'?

Do not try to understand a species you do not belong to. Or at least start with basic grammar.

 

[Data_Gold]

If the one who is of the female sex of the species homo (no homo) sapien is in possession of what is usually seen as the male of said species reproductive tube, which is more commonly known as 'the penis', will it be considered homosexual (no homo) which is commonly defined as the attraction towards those of the same sex as yourself to be attracted to such female without saying 'no homo'?

that's a lot of word salad to ask; "fellas, is it gay to suck girl's cock?" ૮-ᆺ- ა

 

[Garett]

at least start with basic grammar.

One might employ the capabilities of an artificial intelligence, not for the purpose of merely restructuring pre-existing text into a more concise or alternative form, but rather to engage in the art of wording—the deliberate use of an abundance of words to express a simple thought or concept, thereby enriching and expanding the statement beyond its fundamental essence.

 

[Angry_Panda]

One might employ the capabilities of an artificial intelligence, not for the purpose of merely restructuring pre-existing text into a more concise or alternative form, but rather to engage in the art of wording—the deliberate use of an abundance of words to express a simple thought or concept, thereby enriching and expanding the statement beyond its fundamental essence.

Only if you're trying to write a five page paper with a sticky note's worth of ideas.

 

[UnnamedPlayer]

One might employ the capabilities of an artificial intelligence, not for the purpose of merely restructuring pre-existing text into a more concise or alternative form, but rather to engage in the art of wording—the deliberate use of an abundance of words to express a simple thought or concept, thereby enriching and expanding the statement beyond its fundamental essence.

Philosophers already exist and there is a over-abundance of them due to college stuff, so no thanks you.

(it's a joke, sociologists are the real useless ones)

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

Never noticed 'ow funny trump's Writing style is until I saw Some-one else imitating It :

 

[tilefish]

Never noticed 'ow funny trump's Writing style is until I saw Some-one else imitating It :
View attachment 27942

Every time I see someone writing in all caps I think of the meme, "CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL, but even with cruise control you need to steer."

 

[pandascepter]

translation: foota, say gex?

wheee,e

 

[Manko-sensei]

Obligatory repost since @Doedoel is not happy when I say "lolis":

 

[BakedBanana]

Obligatory repost since @Doedoel is not happy when I say "lolis":
View attachment 28080

Yes lolita, no touch.

 

[Manko-sensei]

Yes lolita, no touch.

 

[sanctuary]

 

[Ivegotnolife]

 

[Tony_Mushah]

Random debates at home.

My mom said that doubting is a sin.
Why?

 

[Manko-sensei]

My mom said that doubting is a sin.
Why?

Because she's a devout Christian?

 

[hazzack]

My mom said that doubting is a sin.
Why?

because you didn't question it with utmost conviction.

Why?! Why can't i doubt?! Why is that my confusion is deemed irredeemable?! Then why would the world lie to me!!

this doubt is not a sin because it's filled with conviction and determination for truth

 

[panzerkampfwagyu]

My mom said that doubting is a sin.
Why?

To test your faith in yourself. If you were a true doubter, you would doubt her claim that it was a sin, then doubt god out of existence.
Then doubt existence itself and learn about the fact that everything that exists is the result of cosmic dodgy accounting (Everything amounts to 0, if calculated)

 

[Tony_Mushah]

Because she's a devout Christian?

Yeah, she often over flex on us that she have the bible read 4 or 5 times.
The bible has cool plot though but i am just lazy to comprehend what is inside it.

To test your faith in yourself. If you were a true doubter, you would doubt her claim that it was a sin, then doubt god out of existence.
Then doubt existence itself and learn about the fact that everything that exists is the result of cosmic dodgy accounting (Everything amounts to 0, if calculated)

I would like but something inside me prevent me doing that.
It is my inner-self that has been brainwashed since I was a toddler.
I am too dogmatized.