I didn't feel the need to quote the post directly above mine.
If I didn't specifically set the thing to watch every thread I post on, I wouldn't even have known.
And I'm saying all this as someone who has survived domestic abuse. Someone who got away from her abuser, and who had a chance to see how badly the abuse has broken her. This is poison, it's killing him and his daughter. It's his prerogative to reject a way to actually survive, just as it's mine to call it out for the obvious bullshit it is.
I see the perspective that confronting or fighting against an abusive spouse might seem like a proactive or empowering course of action. However, considering Reitarou's situation and his desires, direct escalation appears to counteract his intentions and could potentially exacerbate an already volatile situation.
Reitarou’s reluctance to confront or engage in actions that might lead to more intense conflict, such as a contentious divorce, stems from a deeply rational concern for the well-being and future of his daughter, as well as the preservation of his own peace and safety. His approach, characterized by a desire to avoid a massive conflict is not about merely passivity; it's a strategic choice to navigate a complex and potentially harmful situation as safely as possible, and one that reflects his own personal vision for his life.
The idea of fighting back, especially in the context of an abusive relationship, must be weighed against the possible consequences. For Reitarou, the risk of escalating abuse, losing access to his home and daughter, and enduring a grueling legal battle represent significant and tangible threats. These are not just hypothetical outcomes; they are realistic concerns that could have lasting impacts on all involved, especially the most vulnerable.
What's crucial here is the exploration of alternatives that align with Reitarou's priorities and the safety of his family. This might include seeking discreet professional support, legal counsel well-versed in such matters, and safe, strategic planning for any future actions. It’s about finding a path that respects his desire to maintain stability and safety for himself and his daughter, rather than pushing for confrontation that doesn't align with his wishes or could lead to more harm.
I appreciate the intention behind the suggestion to fight the abuse directly. Yet, given Reitarou's circumstances and goals, a more measured and strategic approach that prioritizes safety and long-term stability seems more in line with what he’s aiming for. Finding the right support and resources to navigate this carefully is key.