I'm going to dust off my classroom critique skills here (haven't used them in a while, lol)
Haro's work shows his obvious love of nudes, as that's where all the effort went. The rest suffers horribly. The "classroom" in the piece isn't apparent, and I honestly thought he just forgot to blend or erase the perspective lines. Not gonna lie, I actually laughed when I saw it. I also have to criticize how he seems to default towards torsos and hasn't graduated to full-body drawings. As a result, it feels objectifying by removing emotion or identity from the matter. It doesn't matter how well he can draw a nude, if it feels empty and it's placed in an empty setting.
Kazari doesn't fair much better. While he has a far more all-around consistant and technically impressive work, there's a sterility here. He's properly framed by the nudes around him, with enough dynamism in both the implication of movement and their overlap with the mid-ground. Simultaneously, he misses the theme by cutting the classroom out of the picture, and elevates himself as the subject.
In the end, they're mirrors of each other: Haro wants to make art, but he refuses to learn. Kazari wants to learn all the techniques, but he only makes drawings, not ART.