Taihou to Stamp - Vol. 5 Ch. 35 - Is Being Careless That Far From Being Earnest?

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
801
@Irian
Note that I said the "conceit" of just war. I didn't say that the war based on those motives was actually just.
Motivation is important, but it doesn't excuse. A Inquisitor or a lynch mob really may have purportedly have righteous motives but the results can be just as catastrophic as if a serial-killer performed them.

Where I disagree with you is the purely selfish motives are just as reasonable as misplaced altruistic ones. Yes, there's hypocrisy in the latter, but the former are deliberate, willful evil rather than accidental or unintended evil.
Remember, Sinan wasn't killing combatants in military actions, he was murdering housewives and lovers who were cooking him meals, shooting unarmed allies who trusted him in the back, killing civilians going about their daily business and deliberately destroying the chance to end the war itself.

You can say that fighting for your loved ones, traditions, tribes honor, etc, is just indirect way of fighting for yourself, but these men die willingly for these things; and no matter how you slice it, the people who benefit (family, tribe, etc) are not them. My great-uncle lies dead in a WW2 military cemetery in France. I'm benefiting from that and so are you. My Great Uncle isn't.
He was 21, never even had a girlfriend. His death was unselfish and altruistic.

I also have to disagree with you as well about the idea of war being the ultimate sin. For instance the American Civil War, the British entry in WW2 and the fight by the Arab states against ISIS, to name a few, were all examples of just war. If they hadn't been fought slavery would've persisted for several more generations in the US, the Nazis would still have their Reich, and ISIS would still be murdering and enslaving people in the fertile crescent and on its way to building a blood caliphate.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
66
I would also disagree with the notion of Sinan being "a third-side" of the war.
Mainly because wars are waged for the victory, while Sinan is in it wor the war itself. War gave him power, status, and he strives to keep it this way. His end goal, it seems, is not to win but to perpetuate wa, while other parties are exhausted from the three-year conflict and want to end it, but can't due to ideology and obligations before their own people.
Of course, a lot of people are in this war for personal gain. but they have opportunistic approach. Grab the gold while they can, embezzle while they can, rob and rape while we can. Sinan on the other hand does what he does only to do it again and again. To put it simple, he's a maniac.
Nevertheless, he's a rather compelling villian, on par with constant paperwork chaos.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top