Pardon shitty person, and have to deal with bullshit afterward. Why isekai protagonist keep doing this?
Pardon shitty person, and have to deal with bullshit afterward. Why isekai protagonist keep doing this?
In the WN that was a point brought up that the kid never requested for Cain to be physically hurt. Only that the request was for the adventurers to threaten him. But then it was brushed away with Cain saying that it doesn't matter since he was about to lose an arm either way if he hadn't fought back.Lol, child abuse. That was discipline. Plus the hired thugs wanted to cut off Cain's arm couple chapters ago. And the father is equally, if not more to blame for enabling his son's behavior and by abusing his authority to cover up his sh*t
The MC lets the obvious corrupt noble off the hook in the morning. Tells him to stop abusing his authority. Literally the same day, the corrupt noble plots some shady sh*t. Good job Cain 👍
Discipline is often used as an excuse for abuse. Discipline doesn't need violence, and violence only begets more violence. It's illegal in many countries to lay a hand on a child for good reason. It's not illegal in religious countries, but do you really want your sense of normal to mimic those kinds of nations?also people saying its abuse clearly haven't been spanked by their parents before, the kid got off lightly all things considered.
he only got hit once for something grave, there's a difference between discipline and abuse, this isn't abuse this is VERY LIGHT discipline
if you think about it, it's very light because he's literally about to lose his fortune should things fail
Also, all of this.Except we have seen way worse regularly in this series. Just a few chapters ago thugs wanted to maim the mc who is the same age. Hell lets address that for some reason we are being warned about a slap and book being thrown at him as if they are the dark part of the chapter, when we found out about a child slave ring existing. The warning over played it and was distracting as it changed the mood of the chapter as it primed you to expect somthing that just wasn't there. This mood shift can really hurt the chapter by shifting expectations. It was definitely excessive.
Nah, the way the dude just jumped at the first oportunity to just sweep things under the rug with not only no sign of being annoyed at his child but even gleerful and gloating of getting away with it clearly shows this is far from the first time something like this was done, and as we later confirm it is just a sign of other things he swept under the rug with money.Not to mention the fact that the noble himself hasn't actually done anything wrong besides being a bit conniving in trying to dodge the issue. This was entirely the fault of his very young child, would you really condemn the entire family to death or destitution for the independent ignorant action of a child?
There's a bit a problem with this. You are right that violence and discipline are different. But physical punishment is not violence. And it's horrible to think that physical punishment is violence. That creates the notion that the problem is "What" is done and not the severity. And instead you have emotional and intellectual trauma being inflicted on kids and people going "Oh but it's not violence". And before anyone says "People will tell the difference" That is simply not true. A person will tell the difference, the masses will not. When you train the masses to respond to 'type' they will respond to everything in 'type' and not look at 'severity'. It is literally what is happening right now in America and a lesser extent in the UK on MANY topics. If we want the masses to be deep thinkers we have to treat them like they're deep thinkers and give them the responsibility of deep thinkers.Discipline is often used as an excuse for abuse. Discipline doesn't need violence, and violence only begets more violence. It's illegal in many countries to lay a hand on a child for good reason. It's not illegal in religious countries, but do you really want your sense of normal to mimic those kinds of nations?
With that said, people need to learn how to differentiate a fictional story from reality. It's because it's a work of fiction that it doesn't, and shouldn't, be limited by any norms of any society. A fictional story follows the rules set by the story, not by the world we live in.
Wait, what? It isn't my first language, so do please forgive me for mistakes, but I never claimed that physical punishment isn't violence, if that's what you're saying I claimed(?). I even stated that laying a hand on a child is illegal for good reason in many countries. As for physical punishments however, things such as forcing extra chores or doing situps or running laps and so on, wouldn't count as violence. However, acts of violence are pretty clear by themselves, such as hitting a child's body in any kind of way.There's a bit a problem with this. You are right that violence and discipline are different. But physical punishment is not violence. And it's horrible to think that physical punishment is violence. That creates the notion that the problem is "What" is done and not the severity. And instead you have emotional and intellectual trauma being inflicted on kids and people going "Oh but it's not violence". And before anyone says "People will tell the difference" That is simply not true. A person will tell the difference, the masses will not. When you train the masses to respond to 'type' they will respond to everything in 'type' and not look at 'severity'. It is literally what is happening right now in America and a lesser extent in the UK on MANY topics. If we want the masses to be deep thinkers we have to treat them like they're deep thinkers and give them the responsibility of deep thinkers.
This.There's a bit a problem with this. You are right that violence and discipline are different. But physical punishment is not violence. And it's horrible to think that physical punishment is violence. That creates the notion that the problem is "What" is done and not the severity. And instead you have emotional and intellectual trauma being inflicted on kids and people going "Oh but it's not violence". And before anyone says "People will tell the difference" That is simply not true. A person will tell the difference, the masses will not. When you train the masses to respond to 'type' they will respond to everything in 'type' and not look at 'severity'. It is literally what is happening right now in America and a lesser extent in the UK on MANY topics. If we want the masses to be deep thinkers we have to treat them like they're deep thinkers and give them the responsibility of deep thinkers.
Nope, agree to disagree here. Pain is absolutely a good negative reinforcement tool, as long as it is not taken too far. There are some kids that will not respond to anything but physical reinforcement.Wait, what? It isn't my first language, so do please forgive me for mistakes, but I never claimed that physical punishment isn't violence, if that's what you're saying I claimed(?). I even stated that laying a hand on a child is illegal for good reason in many countries. As for physical punishments however, things such as forcing extra chores or doing situps or running laps and so on, wouldn't count as violence. However, acts of violence are pretty clear by themselves, such as hitting a child's body in any kind of way.
A warning is just a SPOILER, lmao.People really taking the warning a wrong way. A warning is just a warning.
First of all, you claiming "will not respond to anything but" is more a reflection of what you yourself are limited to. It's falling into the world of research into psychology here, which I will not even pretend to know much about, but nobody advocates for violent acts, such as "spank or slap" to quote you. It's true that methods advocated for varies wildly, and some are more convoluted than others, but at the end of the day there's only research showing submissive behavior being learned and the lesson that using violence is a way to make someone stop. Which isn't a good lesson to learn, since it feeds into the spiral of violence begets more violence.There are some kids that will not respond to anything but physical reinforcement.
Things like running laps can be abused too, so I don't see how that is any better than a spank or slap on the wrist.
Discipline is often used as an excuse for abuse. Discipline doesn't need violence, and violence only begets more violence. It's illegal in many countries to lay a hand on a child for good reason. It's not illegal in religious countries, but do you really want your sense of normal to mimic those kinds of nations?
ah yes the classic westerner defense where a little spanking or a small slap is equal abuses set by the story, not by the world we live in.
With that said, people need to learn how to differentiate a fictional story from reality. It's because it's a work of fiction that it doesn't, and shouldn't, be limited by any norms of any society. A fictional story follows the rule
Soon.Anyone know when Corgino will just... disappear ? He's more than just mildly annoying.