You just pointed out the biggest flaw of 99% isekai out there.Could remove "Isekai" and nothing would change. Not anything bad though, this is an interesting story. Seems like they're about to reunite 👀
Isekai is author’s cheat mode which allows a character not to act their age or in other unexplainable ways. It’s often the lazy way to build “character”.Could remove "Isekai" and nothing would change. Not anything bad though, this is an interesting story. Seems like they're about to reunite 👀
If used properly, it can work well.Isekai is author’s cheat mode which allows a character not to act their age or in other unexplainable ways. It’s often the lazy way to build “character”.
If used properly, it can work well.
But then again, most isekai authors aren't that capable.
That’s the problem. Most just use it as a quick fix to explain the mc’s knowledge. In order for it to be actually decent it should have some importance to the story. If you can replace isekai with a smarter-than-normal/mature kid then there’s no reason for isekai. If it’s only a matter of giving the character additional power/OP then isekai is also usually quite meaningless. How many of these stories only mentions isekai things in first chapter for it to never be mentioned or be relevant again?If used properly, it can work well.
But then again, most isekai authors aren't that capable.
There are way to many isekai's "in name only" out there. It's not all bad since there is an amount of them are pretty good, it's just that they should've never been given the isekai tag to begin with due to it being largely irrelevant to the story. IMO, if you're gonna make an isekai, the main character has to have a lingering attachment of any kind to their former lives or knowledge that will assist them with their new lives.Could remove "Isekai" and nothing would change. Not anything bad though, this is an interesting story. Seems like they're about to reunite 👀
I think, for many of them, it could well have been the editors/publishers insisting on it. For a lot of media, companies play by 'familiar = safe profits', and they're not terribly interested in taking risks in putting things out there that don't fit the current trend. This is especially true in written works. Once a series is established, or an author has proven that they can get sales regardless of what they write, they tend to have more freedom in what they can get published, or can move the series to what they wanted it to be in the first place, but until either of those are met... Executive Meddling~ Woo... 🙄.There are way to many isekai's "in name only" out there. It's not all bad since there is an amount of them are pretty good, it's just that they should've never been given the isekai tag to begin with due to it being largely irrelevant to the story. IMO, if you're gonna make an isekai, the main character has to have a lingering attachment of any kind to their former lives or knowledge that will assist them with their new lives.
Yeah, and it's pretty obvious whenever the editors or higher-ups forcefully add an element to a story. I'm a simp for isekai's or any kind of fantasy and I enjoy even the trashiest ones (most of the time), but it does annoy me when the isekai element is introduced only for it rarely touched on again.I think, for many of them, it could well have been the editors/publishers insisting on it. For a lot of media, companies play by 'familiar = safe profits', and they're not terribly interested in taking risks in putting things out there that don't fit the current trend. This is especially true in written works. Once a series is established, or an author has proven that they can get sales regardless of what they write, they tend to have more freedom in what they can get published, or can move the series to what they wanted it to be in the first place, but until either of those are met... Executive Meddling~ Woo... 🙄.
Just like how movie critics failed to see the appeal of the recent Super Mario Bros. movie, and expected it to flop, sometimes the people with influence fail to understand what people expect/want from their media.