The Color of the End: Mission in the Apocalypse - Vol. 1 Ch. 6 - Shelter

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Messages
214
The situation here was just like many vaults in Fallout series. Vault is built with purpose to preserve humankind after apocalypse but there was usually problem occured in each vault and when the player set foot in there, its inhabitant was often wiped out long before, either by internal strife or some horrifying experiment went wrong.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jul 11, 2023
Messages
70
The situation here was just like many vaults in Fallout series. Vault is built with purpose to preserve humankind after apocalypse but there was usually problem occurred in each vault and when the player set foot in there, its inhabitant was often wiped out long before, either by internal strife or some horrifying experiment went wrong.
Man, I swear I heard this lore in YouTube of one of the Vaults in the Fallout Series, particularly that Vault that need to vote an Overseer (or sacrifice?) every some period of time, and this chapter kind of got the same circumstance.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
755
The situation here was just like many vaults in Fallout series. Vault is built with purpose to preserve humankind after apocalypse but there was usually problem occured in each vault and when the player set foot in there, its inhabitant was often wiped out long before, either by internal strife or some horrifying experiment went wrong.
In fallout case though about 50% are intentionally manufactured to be like that.

The rest are 45% vault being destroyed by some unforseen circumstances (although most of them are still from Vault-Tec fuckery, only indirectly/the first domino to fall), and 5% oddball that have some survivors.
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Aug 31, 2024
Messages
214
Well, I guess setting your criteria based on eugenics (banning the chronically ill and anyone injured, both of which can have their definitions expanded until they fit pretty much everyone) probably doesn’t net you a group that is willing to cooperate.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
237
Well, I guess setting your criteria based on eugenics (banning the chronically ill and anyone injured, both of which can have their definitions expanded until they fit pretty much everyone) probably doesn’t net you a group that is willing to cooperate.
Looking at the level of development of the cities, it is likely the population even in just the local areas was in the multiple millions. Based on the small number of people allowed inside it is likely that those numbers had fallen significantly by the time it was operational that may have negatively affected the selection process. There is no reason under the expectation that there is a large selection pool for such a small facility (likely only capable of holding 0.0001% or less of the population) to purposely allow survivors that may not have a long lifespan or have a high risk of passing down or spreading negative affects into the facility and compromising the rest of the population.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top