@Kynnath
Excuse me if I missed your sarcasm, but the decision to turn back time (and not understanding the consequences of doing so) to change history (because these events don’t just impact Lizzie’s life) for a person who he spent most of his previous life at best wary of but never even genuinely cared for (because she was so messed up by the time she got married by no fault of her own, poor baby).
And now he’s remarkably devoted to making her life happy? All of the based on reading her diary after she died? But couldn’t spare to have at least one conversation to get to understand her while she was alive? (Since she would’ve very likely still be alive in the old time line if she didn’t get poisoned and had an ounce of self-preservation. Again, poor baby.) I understand the guilt and belated grief, but this is an incredibly rash decision.
I do hope they get to explaining some things in the past that we have yet to see. Like maybe he wanted to get to know her but couldn’t understand her motives? Could ever really trust her given his position? Maybe he spent more time thinking about the disastrous consequences of time travel?
Although, I’m actually really enjoying the story (and the art), this is a plot point I had to skip over because it was really poorly fleshed out in the beginning.
But yes, now he can spend his entire life to making this girl happy. And Lizzie deserves to live in a safe space and be a kid, so I’m not mad at it. (Also, taking his time? He basically snatched that girl out of her home after 2.5 visits. Yes, she needed to get out of that home, but that was also pretty quick after just meeting her in this timeline. Lol)