THE FORUM CULLING GAMES

[yogurtman250]

this is two rules in one dude, and you offered @K.Angel to add it as well even though he'd already come up with a rule. you should remove it.

also, even if you do add it, you need to specify more. are the current scores of all Rolands cut in half? are the gained scores going forward for all Rolands cut in half? what about the +4 reaction bonus that was in K.Angel's original message? is that not included? even if i wasn't a Roland i would still find this extremely objectionable.

It's supposed to be the current scores. I see the rule proposals are like one thing, which is why I combined the two purposals. If i wanted to, I would've done the same for yours. But since you're technically correct, i'll stop doing that from now on, and give you an extra rule to propose, free of charge. Just open a direct conversation!

 

[yogurtman250]

It's supposed to be the current scores. I see the rule proposals are like one thing, which is why I combined the two purposals. If i wanted to, I would've done the same for yours. But since you're technically correct, i'll stop doing that from now on, and give you an extra rule to propose, free of charge. Just open a direct conversation!

Actually on second thought, i'll just remove the second part of the rule.

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

It's supposed to be the current scores. I see the rule proposals are like one thing, which is why I combined the two purposals. If i wanted to, I would've done the same for yours. But since you're technically correct, i'll stop doing that from now on, and give you an extra rule to propose, free of charge. Just open a direct conversation!

alright, thanks. if it's just halving the current scores once then that's not too egregious (even though it probably still shouldn't be added unless it's a separate rule). but i agree that keeping rules particular going forward is indeed the right move.

i'll try to come up with a decent rule proposal in DMs.

 

[Itsukimoto]

nah it's ridiculous-nya.

@yogurtman250 don't you understand that this rule is two unrelated rules in one? (and only because you asked K.Angel at the last second to add it because you thought it'd be funny.)

if you want to maintain the game's integrity then you should remove the second part (the second part is also way too vague). if someone wants to add the second part as a separate rule down the line, then that'd be one thing. but you're putting two rules in one right now.

Yeah you can't just add something this unfair on a whim-nyah

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Actually on second thought, i'll just remove the second part of the rule.

thanks, that's probably the best move. @K.Angel will still benefit from the rule as he intended, just without the added anti-Roland measure

 

[yogurtman250]

alright, thanks. if it's just halving the current scores once then that's not too egregious (even though it probably still shouldn't be added unless it's a separate rule). but i agree that keeping rules particular going forward is indeed the right move.

i'll try to come up with a decent rule proposal in DMs.

Actually since the second part is removed, I think the extra rule is unnecessary. Sorry about that

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Yeah you can't just add something this unfair on a whim-nyah

thankfully yogurtman rescinded the second part. as for any future rules though... i can't say we Rolands won't be a target

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Actually since the second part is removed, I think the extra rule is unnecessary. Sorry about that

right, no problem, i agree. i accepted before i saw your second message lol.

 

[yogurtman250]

Also quick note, today's score tally may be a bit late since I have to go do something today...

 

[Itsukimoto]

thankfully yogurtman rescinded the second part. as for any future rules though... i can't say we Rolands won't be a target

The future may be full of hardships, but as long as we Rolands stick together everything will turn out fine-nyah

 

[BakedBanana]

glad I'm the only Roland not participating in this

Uh, Roland bro. I'm also not participating.

 

[yogurtman250]

glad I'm the only Roland not participating in this

You said you weren't? You got a point, after all.

 

[Itsukimoto]

Uh, Roland bro. I'm also not participating.

You got eliminated Roland-nyah

 

[BakedBanana]

You got eliminated Roland-nyah

On purpose lol, I knew if I didn't choose one then that dastardly @yogurtman250 would put me in Casual Chatting or one of the other threads I participated in.

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Uh, Roland bro. I'm also not participating.

On purpose lol, I knew if I didn't choose one then that dastardly @yogurtman250 would put me in Casual Chatting or one of the other threads I participated in.

you would've been a fierce Rolally (Roland+Ally (very clever i know)), but you're still invaluable as a Moral Support Roland.

 

[yogurtman250]

you would've been a fierce Rolally (Roland+Ally (very clever i know)), but you're still invaluable as a Moral Support Roland.

Just so you know, you could add an rule that can negate this tragedy, wink wink

 

[DavidianMillerian]

Uh, Roland bro. I'm also not participating.

I guess that's another thing we're matching together

 

[yogurtman250]

I guess that's another thing we're matching together

I don't know what you're talking about, the only way to not participate is to get eliminated

 

[BakedBanana]

Just so you know, you could add an rule that can negate this tragedy, wink wink

Sounds like a waste of a rule since I've already told you I would just ignore MangaDex for a day and die again.

Oniichan Control chapter 24

 

[Itsukimoto]

On purpose lol, I knew if I didn't choose one then that dastardly @yogurtman250 would put me in Casual Chatting or one of the other threads I participated in.

I know-nyah... if you would've played having three rolands would be too unfair to game-nyah