THE FORUM CULLING GAMES

CHOOSE WISELY


  • Total voters
    23
Perpetual Newbie
Joined
Dec 7, 2025
Messages
2,174
also tbh attempting to add this on every rule of yours is lame.


my point is that you should reject K.Angel's new rule as it's set to override Rule 7 specifically. at the very least you should make K.Angel revise the rule so it actually makes sense.

either way, remove parts 6, 7, and "This rule shall be allowed to be activated Retrospectively", and the rule itself isn't the worst.
Part 6 is removed, actually. I'm just too lazy to do remove it from the quote. I get your point for part 7 so it's removed as well. The new rule takes place the reset, so I'll give you until that time to either evoke your Authority or fall into effect with this rule. you and David's Authoritys should still be in effect, but you'll get the reduction from the new rule for this tally too. After that, you cannot evoke Authority you apply the conditions.

are we thinking of the same rule? the one that allows a player to attempt to change the active thread of another player by spending 67 points? although i don't think that rule will be invoked for the rest of the game, i don't see why it's not still available to use.
No, that's just an example. My dumbass isn't good with grammer. I can't read lmao. Sorry for the inconvenience

okay so nullified. the new rule proposed by K.Angel does totally nullify Rule 7. in Rule 7, it's specified that users with a Roland pfp can opt to identify as "K.Angel" according to the Culling Game's logic. but in K.Angel's new proposed rule, it states that there can only be one way to identify as "K.Angel" for the rest of the Culling Game, and nullifies Rule 7 by stating that "Imitation K.Angel"s must don a K.Angel pfp (which strictly conflicts with the Roland pfp). also the attempts to add multiple clauses of irreversibility is very lame and unimaginative
Oh right completely forgot about that. @K.Angel sorry you can't do that you gotta remove part 2
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
12,783
Part 6 is removed, actually. I'm just too lazy to do remove it from the quote. I get your point for part 7 so it's removed as well. The new rule takes place the reset, so I'll give you until that time to either evoke your Authority or fall into effect with this rule. you and David's Authoritys should still be in effect, but you'll get the reduction from the new rule for this tally too. After that, you cannot evoke Authority you apply the conditions.
If the 'this rule is retroactive' is removed from the new rule, then that would mean that David and I already invoked Authority for today, so that will still take effect.

We won't get the reduction from part 3 of the new rule because we're not using Rule 7 to identify as "K.Angel" at any point in time after the new rule takes effect. (Hope that makes sense the way I worded it. Basically, if we attempt to use Rule 7 AFTER this new rule goes into effect, only THEN will we have to forfeit points. But since we already used Rule 7 to invoke Authority for today, we don't need to forfeit any points).
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
12,783
@yogurtman250 basically:

-we used Rule 7 to identify as "K.Angel" and invoked Authority for the day
-K.Angel (the user) wants to add a rule near the end of the day that will make it so imitating identifying as "K.Angel" will forfeit 50% of a user's points

so i'm saying that allowing the rule to take effect retroactively like that is ridiculous. apply it to the next day forward and then it'll make more sense. (not that the new rule even makes much sense to begin with. it's like bro just vomited onto a canvas and assumed we'd understand it.)
 
Perpetual Newbie
Joined
Dec 7, 2025
Messages
2,174
@yogurtman250 basically:

-we used Rule 7 to identify as "K.Angel" and invoked Authority for the day
-K.Angel (the user) wants to add a rule near the end of the day that will make it so imitating identifying as "K.Angel" will forfeit 50% of a user's points

so i'm saying that allowing the rule to take effect retroactively like that is ridiculous. apply it to the next day forward and then it'll make more sense. (not that the new rule even makes much sense to begin with. it's like bro just vomited onto a canvas and assumed we'd understand it.)
I gotta go to class, so i'll just remove the retroactive rule and just go on with the rest of the day
 
Group Leader
Joined
Dec 12, 2024
Messages
780
Honestly, I'm a bit lost at this point... there are just so many rules, and keeping track of them all has become really overwhelming, Even if I tried to create new ones, there's probably already something in place that counters it,, I can't quite remember everything, and finding the time to go through it all feels like a stretch....

And with a coalition working together, it kind of feels like an uphill battle...... almost like I'm on my own against a group. I won't lie, it's a little discouraging....I might end up being the next one out, but honestly... I think I'm okay with that. Sometimes it's just not worth the energy...
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
12,783
My gosh, this is so confusing! How do you keep track of it all?
autism
azumanga-daioh-azumanga.gif
 
Perpetual Newbie
Joined
Dec 7, 2025
Messages
2,174
DING DONG DING DONG!
kogane-flying.gif

THE FINAL DAY HAS ENDED!

JUST LIKE A CERTAIN SERIES, I HAVE DECIDED TO SUDDENLY END THE CULLING GAMES.
BECAUSE OF THIS, @K.Angel's new rule has been refunded.
THE RESULTS ARE...

@BakedBanana finishes in 5th place with 113 points!
@gimme_yuri_plz finishes with 253 points!
@K.Angel FINISHES IN 3RD PLACE WITH 316 POINTS!
@DavidianMillerian FINISHES IN 2ND PLACE, WITH 443 POINTS!
LAST BUT NOT LEAST...
@bigtiddyoneesan FINISHES IN 1ST PLACE, WITH 830 POINTS!!

THIS MEANS...
image.png

0208-017.png

image-(1).png

GOOD LUCK! :02:
Because of the nature of the finale, this can be considered the "final score" for the culling games. Sorry, K.Angel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top