Perpetual Newbie
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2025
- Messages
- 2,174
Part 6 is removed, actually. I'm just too lazy to do remove it from the quote. I get your point for part 7 so it's removed as well. The new rule takes place the reset, so I'll give you until that time to either evoke your Authority or fall into effect with this rule. you and David's Authoritys should still be in effect, but you'll get the reduction from the new rule for this tally too. After that, you cannot evoke Authority you apply the conditions.also tbh attempting to add this on every rule of yours is lame.
my point is that you should reject K.Angel's new rule as it's set to override Rule 7 specifically. at the very least you should make K.Angel revise the rule so it actually makes sense.
either way, remove parts 6, 7, and "This rule shall be allowed to be activated Retrospectively", and the rule itself isn't the worst.
No, that's just an example. My dumbass isn't good with grammer. I can't read lmao. Sorry for the inconvenienceare we thinking of the same rule? the one that allows a player to attempt to change the active thread of another player by spending 67 points? although i don't think that rule will be invoked for the rest of the game, i don't see why it's not still available to use.
Oh right completely forgot about that. @K.Angel sorry you can't do that you gotta remove part 2okay so nullified. the new rule proposed by K.Angel does totally nullify Rule 7. in Rule 7, it's specified that users with a Roland pfp can opt to identify as "K.Angel" according to the Culling Game's logic. but in K.Angel's new proposed rule, it states that there can only be one way to identify as "K.Angel" for the rest of the Culling Game, and nullifies Rule 7 by stating that "Imitation K.Angel"s must don a K.Angel pfp (which strictly conflicts with the Roland pfp). also the attempts to add multiple clauses of irreversibility is very lame and unimaginative