I disagree a significant amount: the people themselves are absolutely at fault too. I dislike the idea that "the people" are just complete sheep unable to do anything and with no responsibilities of their own. They're clearly heaping enormous amounts onto one convenient "savior" after another with no thinking about the person in question as a person themselves or sympathy for their own challenges, and then on top are extremely fickle about their opinions which in turn directly affects said person's ability to help them. It's a crap situation, but "everyone made mistakes" also includes those that died.But everyone made mistakes here: Natalia's brother for giving the sword to Sara despite the danger to the kingdom, Natalia for not killing Sara to get the sword back when she had the chance. What's really sad is that those who ended up paying for this mistakes are the people. So many people died. There's no fixed that now. Even if Natalia and Sara make it out alive from this, it won't change the fact a lot of people died, people Natalia was responsible for since she's the queen.
I didn’t realize that Undine was on the forumsAt the end of the day, the decision Natalia had to face was always about choosing between Sara and her people. She can't have both. You know, the whole you can't have your pie and eat it too.
And while it might sound romantic that she chose Sara over her people, she had a responsibility to them as their queen, and she failed them. She might be able to save those who were petrified, but a lot of people are already dead and there's no fixing that.
It's my problem here. Sara choose to be the host of the sword so the whole situation is mostly on her. The sole reason we're in this situation is because Sara have the sword. Natalia try her best with what she have. Trying to give people faith in Sara and simulate her death is the best she can with the tools at her disposale.Worth noting that, in this version, Sara intentionally went to take Sylpheed. She wasn't tricked into it, Natalia wasn't in immediate danger, and it wasn't life or death for Sara, though she was happy to die if the sword killed her.
I totally agree with you. It's always a ruler's fault when the kingdom goes up in flame but never the people who, generally, hold a good 60 to 70% of the blame.I disagree a significant amount: the people themselves are absolutely at fault too. I dislike the idea that "the people" are just complete sheep unable to do anything and with no responsibilities of their own. They're clearly heaping enormous amounts onto one convenient "savior" after another with no thinking about the person in question as a person themselves or sympathy for their own challenges, and then on top are extremely fickle about their opinions which in turn directly affects said person's ability to help them. It's a crap situation, but "everyone made mistakes" also includes those that died.
Also, in both series monsters have started reappearing through the wall when they hadn't for a very long time. That doesn't have much to do with the sword and hasn't been fully explained yet. I feel like we're forgetting that part of the equation too. Could be nothing but another thing to remember. All interesting stuff!I totally agree with you. It's always a ruler's fault when the kingdom goes up in flame but never the people who, generally, hold a good 60 to 70% of the blame.
How did Natalia's whole family kick the bucket again? Because having the father and brother dying in such quick succession start to feel suspicious...
This chapter reminds me that much of the legend about Natalia, the sword and her family is based on embellishment, in both versions and that we don't really know what the sword can do. The stories of the sword are mostly fabrications, and it has not been used in 300 years.The walls had done all the protecting.