To Your Eternity - Vol. 8 Ch. 69 - A Silent Oath

[MangaDex]

 

[herianforce]

"March would love to see her"
Oh damn this is sad
Bon why you didn't tell her
And then I can't wait to see Kahaku rape Fushi...

 

[ButteryBiscuit]

@herianforce Nigga what? The fuck is going on here?

 

[shadowgrail]

Now we know why the nameless boy wasn't revived. We don't actually see him following Fushi around in Chapter 64.

 

[RexNemorensis]

Fushi seems to have found something quite... precious to him.

@herianforce Fushi is by now an immortal, shape-shifting engine of destruction. Raping him would be a little beyond Kahaku's capabilities. I would also say it's beyond his morals, if not for his ancestors' track record. He seems like a cool guy, though.

 

[Keimichi]

Wait, is this gonna turn into a love triangle? ?

 

[moel]

If fushi accept him, then become pregnant, if fushi shape shifting will the fetus gone?

 

[RandomPasserby]

This is getting weird... er

 

[Australis]

At least is a doll, not a pillow...

 

[A-tan]

Brush him off, Fushi, go and elope with your newfound love! Miss Doll!! She the real MVP.

 

[Pentao]

An immortal being who can shapeshift into anyone and anything

> "I want to fuck it"

ok
can't say it's not realistic

 

[SomeoneWasHere]

I'm pissed that they glossed over LGBT issues by making Todo a girl. Why must anime/manga always do that?

 

[Pentao]

@SomeoneWasHere

Well, there's still the issue of Fushi's "gender and sexual identity" if Fushi even has one.

But if you're looking for a manga that handles sexuality more honestly without being yuri/yaoi, there's a guy in Hoshino-san Me wo Tsubutte who is treated pretty seriously and is upfront gay in that series.

 

[Igmk]

This guy wants Fushi to be a girl really badly.
Someone should tell him Fushi started out as a rock.

 

[criver]

@SomeoneWasHere: Wait wut? You're pissed at the author because a character is not gay? Did I get this wrong?

 

[SomeoneWasHere]

@criver I'm mad that instead of including sexual diversity, they just did what I've seen in multiple manga and make a possibly gay character, straight by revealing their true gender. (Like Kanae from Tokyo Ghoul)
@Pentao thanks for the recommendation!

 

[shadowgrail]

@SomeoneWasHere Todo was always a girl. I'm pretty sure she's the same girl Bonchien liked when he was younger. The author dropped us a hint when she recognized his handkerchief. She has the same haircut too.

 

[criver]

@SomeoneWasHere: I don't see how having a gay character would make things different in any relevant manner. Blaming the author that he doesn't make his work "sexually diverse" is ridiculous - this is not the main theme of his work anyways.
Not to mention that you have more than enough of that with our MC, especially the latest chapters.
Additionally, there are more than enough shounen-ai and shoujo-ai works out there to cater to people that want more "sexual diversity".

 

[SomeoneWasHere]

@criver I'm saying I want LGBT characters in stories that arn't yaoi/yuri. We need more LGBT characters in works that arn't yaoi/yuri.
I'm saying is that many authors don't include it because they are scared to include a character like that, so they always end up being a ambiguous looking character. I'm not hating on the ENTIRE work, just this one thing.
Instead of bringing up LGBT issues, they just gloss over them. I would've been fine if Todo was a boy or a girl, but I'm not fine with them baiting us and turning a relatable character into another one I can find anywhere.

 

[criver]

@SomeoneWasHere: Firstly, there's a fine line between shounen-ai/shoujo-ai and yaoi/yuri. Secondly, "We need more LGBT characters in works that aren't yuri/yaoi" is not a valid argument, it's simply something you want for one reason or another.
Why should the author bring up LGBT issues? Is there a valid reason for this that has to do with the plot consistency? Would this make his work better?
I also don't believe you can jump to conclusions as to whether the author is scared or whatever. There's simply not enough evidence to back up such claims.
The author is not "baiting" you either. You simply seem to be fixated on the idea that there should be a gay character for some reason.
I am trying to understand your point of view, but I am having a really hard time.