Sensei just delayed progress for the next 50 chapters.
cutting things off because the other party wants more commitment than you're trying to give is the opposite of leading someone on. leading you on would be implying that commitment could happen without ever making it.The lead you on part actually hurts btw, some really annoying chicks just want situationships, the moment you actually wanna go into a proper relation where you wanna be labelled as one they do a complete fucking 180.
Well I did not give the full picture of what I was talking about, but I can understand why you are making that point.cutting things off because the other party wants more commitment than you're trying to give is the opposite of leading someone on. leading you on would be implying that commitment could happen without ever making it.
WOMEN
![]()
thank you for translation
That's not what they're talking about. They're talking about where they lead someone on with their words and actions, make them feel like they're really into them, but when that person finally tries to take the next step and offers their heart to advance the relationship, they get spurned with contempt, because the woman wanted the benefits of a relationship without the responsibility/commitment of it, aka a situationship, through subterfuge.cutting things off because the other party wants more commitment than you're trying to give is the opposite of leading someone on. leading you on would be implying that commitment could happen without ever making it.
if you can tell they're doing it, it's funny as hell to go cold first thoThat's not what they're talking about. They're talking about where they lead someone on with their words and actions, make them feel like they're really into them, but when that person finally tries to take the next step and offers their heart to advance the relationship, they get spurned with contempt, because the woman wanted the benefits of a relationship without the responsibility/commitment of it, aka a situationship, through subterfuge.