Tondemonai Komyushou-san ga Oku-san ni Naru made... - Ch. 7 - As I Get More Intimate With This Communication-Challenged Girl... 1%

[flannan]

That's pretty much apparent, but doesn't really explain why.

Sorry, but what kind of answer are you expecting?
Do you seek insight into human male sexuality?
Do you want me to make up an evolutionary psychology explanation? (most evolutionary psychology explanations clearly overestimate the power of heredity and genes in humans)
Do you want me to brew up a rant from a feminist perspective?

I'm just trying to understand why you think people with relationship experiences are undesirable. Are you speaking from experience?

Look, if a girl had 1-5 previous romantic relationships - that just means she is a human.
If a girl had 20+ previous romantic relationships - this indicates she is an extrovert and doesn't take relationships seriously. Probably sees you as a one-night stand too.

Of course, the older she is, the more relationships a serious person could have over time. An elf or a vampire could easily have dozens of romances over the centuries, while being deadly serious about each of them. While having even one romantic relationship as a kindergartener is a cause for alarm.

 

[altmaria]

Look, if a girl had 1-5 previous romantic relationships - that just means she is a human.
If a girl had 20+ previous romantic relationships - this indicates she is an extrovert and doesn't take relationships seriously. Probably sees you as a one-night stand too.

Thanks for your answer. How many women have you been with to reach that conclusion?

 

[flannan]

Thanks for your answer. How many women have you been with to reach that conclusion?

I dated 2 women, back when I was young. Don't take me for some expert on romance, but I do have decent insight into my own thought processes.

 

[BuyVelomobiles]

I'll end this the same I started: asking why... Because you are incapable of answering it yourself, and yet you accuse me of it... You are clearly projecting, I just don't really know why, but oh well...

Sluts are gross, yo.

 

[happypurple]

Then you are not capable of having this discussion. I stated two arguments in my first post as to why someone would prefer more experienced partners, even though i disagree with them. I showed capacity to at least understand the other side on some level. You simply lack the empathy to do so. I still hope that this is not the case and you are just in debate-mode, because the alternative would be really sad, and you actually would have a lot of problems in your life if you can't see others eye to eye, especially if you disagree with them. I'll give you the last word for this meta-discussion about discussions. Take it or leave it.

Talking down to someone about empathy is actual comedy, esp in this context lmfao. Can't y'all just keep your ideas to yourselves or log off, go outside, and try putting them into practice? 💀

 

[gearoi92]

Talking down to someone about empathy is actual comedy, esp in this context lmfao. Can't y'all just keep your ideas to yourselves or log off, go outside, and try putting them into practice? 💀

Why didn't you yourself keep this to yourself? Did you really have to type this out? How about you practise what you preach first.

 

[wallsg]

plot twist: this chapter is from the pov of her second match

Oh, that would be different for this type of comic. A sukida-meter battle between First-kun and NTR-kun.

 

[happypurple]

Why didn't you yourself keep this to yourself? Did you really have to type this out? How about you practise what you preach first.

Just thought I'd stop by to let you know you're contemptible! 😉

 

[gearoi92]

Just thought I'd stop by to let you know you're contemptible! 😉

Okay, let's do this. Why do you think that i was talking down to them? Did you read everything? Are you aware that that person was most likely playing dumb by refusing to answer one simple question?
"Could you imagine why, even if you don't have to agree with the reason, as to why someone could prefer a partner without much experience than someone with 20+ partners?"
How about you're being traditionally jewish and it's against your beliefs to want someone that has slept around/had many relationships? So the reason would be religious, just for example.

You don't have to agree with it. But you must be able to show a basic level of emotional intelligence to be capable of understanding the other party that you disagree with. Just one reason. And they didn't give it. Why? I doubt because they were too dumb, it was because they were in debate-mode and refused to bite the bullet. If they said "Yes, here is one reason why i think someone might prefer women without 20+ men she was with:", they would have lost the argument i made from the beginning, that they just played dumb by "just asking questions".

Now you tell me, what did you think you were doing by coming in here, and giving a not-so-well-thought-through analysis about the whole situation?

 

[happypurple]

Okay, let's do this. Why do you think that i was talking down to them? Did you read everything? Are you aware that that person was most likely playing dumb by refusing to answer one simple question?

Because you were talking down to them?! Your own words were "you are not capable of having this discussion (...) I showed capacity to at least understand the other side on some level. You simply lack the empathy to do so." If anyone in this thread needs empathy its you.

"Could you imagine why, even if you don't have to agree with the reason, as to why someone could prefer a partner without much experience than someone with 20+ partners?" How about you're being traditionally jewish and it's against your beliefs to want someone that has slept around/had many relationships? So the reason would be religious, just for example. You don't have to agree with it. But you must be able to show a basic level of emotional intelligence to be capable of understanding the other party that you disagree with. Just one reason. And they didn't give it. Why? I doubt because they were too dumb, it was because they were in debate-mode and refused to bite the bullet. If they said "Yes, here is one reason why i think someone might prefer women without 20+ men she was with:", they would have lost the argument i made from the beginning, that they just played dumb by "just asking questions".

Usually when I see someone give a complicated answer in reply to a question that's framed simply/in a certain way (e.g. "answer yes or no") it's because they're trying to give more info than the framing of the question would allow, not get around answering. Even if they really were playing dumb, your responses are not flattering. If anyone is in "debate-mode" its you. If anything, I see the way you made a point of framing the question the way you did as an indication that you're not trying to encourage an actual conversation. Their initial question may have been vague, but in my opinion it made sense to ask. On the other hand, it appears to me as though you are trying to hijack the convo and dictate terms one-sidedly, which is why I felt inclined to leave a comment.

Now you tell me, what did you think you were doing by coming in here, and giving a not-so-well-thought-through analysis about the whole situation?

Am I wrong tho? Since you ask, I'm not here to debate the topic, I'm here to be entertained. You on the other hand, could've just exited the convo and let them be "wrong" bc the convo has no stakes. Insulting people in a debate isn't some magic spell to making them think you're right, it encourages resentment and makes people even less likely to concede than before. And on that note, allow me to demonstrate my lack of concern for your opinions by leaving the conversation and in so doing demonstrate for you how best to stop humoring a conversation I clearly have no interest in taking seriously!

Cheerio!

 

[gearoi92]

Because you were talking down to them?! Your own words were "you are not capable of having this discussion (...) I showed capacity to at least understand the other side on some level. You simply lack the empathy to do so." If anyone in this thread needs empathy its you.



Usually when I see someone give a complicated answer in reply to a question that's framed simply/in a certain way (e.g. "answer yes or no") it's because they're trying to give more info than the framing of the question would allow, not get around answering. Even if they really were playing dumb, your responses are not flattering. If anyone is in "debate-mode" its you. If anything, I see the way you made a point of framing the question the way you did as an indication that you're not trying to encourage an actual conversation. Their initial question may have been vague, but in my opinion it made sense to ask. On the other hand, it appears to me as though you are trying to hijack the convo and dictate terms one-sidedly, which is why I felt inclined to leave a comment.


Am I wrong tho? Since you ask, I'm not here to debate the topic, I'm here to be entertained. You on the other hand, could've just exited the convo and let them be "wrong" bc the convo has no stakes. Insulting people in a debate isn't some magic spell to making them think you're right, it encourages resentment and makes people even less likely to concede than before. And on that note, allow me to demonstrate my lack of concern for your opinions by leaving the conversation and in so doing demonstrate for you how best to stop humoring a conversation I clearly have no interest in taking seriously!

Cheerio!

You are wrong though. This was a simple question. Give an example as to why your other party might think differently than you. That's it. Not being able to give one in this whole discussion was just them refusing to do so.
Also, you are definitely not here to be "entertained". Anything else you have to say? If not, don't forget to clean that white armor of yours on your way out.

Edit: My bad, i only now read the end and had a good laugh:

And on that note, allow me to demonstrate my lack of concern for your opinions by leaving the conversation and in so doing demonstrate for you how best to stop humoring a conversation I clearly have no interest in taking seriously!

tips fedora lol. lmao even.

 

[phil777]

Could you guys drop it? =.=