You make some excellent observations! However, I would like to clarify two things. First, the roles/responsibility of a commander has nothing to do with a rigid chain of command or leadership philosophy. I would say that the role of a commander actually falls firmly into the "science" aspect of warfare. It doesn't matter what the commander's leadership philosophy is or what unit they belong to; their duty remains the same.
I agree! I just don't think that Karen has much to actively do because she has trained her unit to follow her ethics and trusts them to carry out their orders accordingly, without needing her input, which is quite different from how it works in modern militaries but was quite common with older era militaries, especially those still employing swords and armor as primary tools of war.
Second (and this is one of my pet peeves simply because it happens a lot), please do not dismiss concepts because they "only apply to modern militaries". I try to stress this every time, but when I do these analyses I do my utmost to stick to concepts that apply universally (hence the "science" vs the "art"). It does get pretty close to the line sometimes, though. But I am of the opinion that it does not cross the line specifically when it comes to what a commander is actually supposed to do.
I am not dismissing any concept because it "only applies to modern militaries", I'm noting that the rigid structure you are referring to within the military is a very modern concept. This isn't to say there weren't any rules in older forms of military, and often punishments would be far more immediate and severe for breaking those rules- but they were still overall far more lax in their organizational structures, even before (in terms of going back through the ages from today) you get to the eras where militaries were made up almost entirely of conscripts beneath nobles, who wielded the military strength as their own personal backing, with only a few general rules of war that were accepted culturally.
There's actually an entirely different but equally interesting discussion/rant I want to make about how the Black Hawk is organized and functions (and the Kingdom in general). I disagree that the Black Hawk functions similarly to MI6 (MI6 is an intelligence agency), but I do agree that it has some similarity to a special forces group in terms of organization if not mission set. But in SOF, commander guidance is even MORE vital to the unit than a normal unit. There is an ENORMOUS amount of planning involved in each and every SOF mission. If Karen was the equivalent of a SOF commander, I would be judging her even more harshly. But I don't think the Black Hawk comes even close to doing anything related to the Kingdom's equivalent of special operations. And in my mind, the Black Hawk is at minimum a company-sized element because of what I believe to be their mission set (I may expand upon these ideas in a future rant).
I stated MI6 for a very specific reason; Their stated areas of focus are,
- Counter Terrorism – stopping terrorist attacks in the UK, against our interests overseas, and supporting our allies
- Disrupting Hostile State Activity – tackling threats from hostile and malign states, promoting the UK’s prosperity and influencing international affairs
- Cyber – promoting and defending the UK’s cyber realm and using our cyber expertise to reduce threats.
These match up quite well to the roles that we see the Black Hawk function as in the story previously; they don't deal with common bandits, but when a big named group that is functionally a terrorist group shows up, they're there. When there's terrorist activity caused by enemy state actors, they're there. When there is demon activity, they're there. When there's disruption in an allied state, they're there supporting them. The "cyber" aspect would be equivalent to the "magic" and "magic tools" aspect in their world, and they were the ones called in to deal with the complicated magic barriers and evil eye based on magical expertise, not just on their role. I will say they fail hard in the "intelligence" part of things, though, hah!
As for the size- They're the fourth cavalry unit within the knight's regiment. At Haru's graduation ceremony, there were approximately 35 new recruits, which just a few chapters later was pared down to only a few remaining (because they weren't up to snuff), so it's not like they're hurting for bodies and needing to pack the ranks, either. That further confirms for me that they are a small, elite unit, rather than a company-sized element like you suggest; that seems more accurately to be the entire Knight's Regiment, which Karen's father is the commanding officer thereof.
Plus, Ian Fleming, man.
Additionally, the operational leeway you mention is actually another part of Mission Command! But in actuality, SOF doesn't get as much leeway as you think they do, primarily because of the nature of their missions. But that also is another aspect of Mission Command! Mission Command is a fascinating subject, and there's a lot more I want to say about it in the context of your comment because it's another fun rabbit hole to jump into. But I won't here, because this is already going on pretty long.
Current modern SOF somewhat agreed, because they at least nominally have governmental oversight and have to justify their actions to the public; prior to 1994, however, MI6 had fairly broad operational leeway because they were a shadow organization prior to that. CIA and FBI were actually quite similar back then, too, with programs like MKULTRA or its predecessor Project Artichoke for the former, and Cointelpro for the latter.
If you want to discuss more, reach out to me on discord. Don't think the MD comments section is the best discussion platform for this lol, so I won't be replying more here probably. I do appreciate how much thought you're putting into this though. There's a lot of interesting topics to dive into and aspects to consider when it comes to military analyses of fictional works.
I actually prefer the longform format of the forums, because it allows for time to think as writing one's reply (in total I believe I've spent about an hour writing this response), and to go back and edit as necessary, though I can see why you'd say that the MD comments section specifically is not the best discussion platform for this topic in general.