The story is working through what it means to save others and the reasons why you'd do that and the reasons why you wouldn't and the value in life. It has used Satsuki, the President, and Komachi throughout to give perspectives, with each of them having a flawed approach.Explain how?
he didn't kill anyone directly
also i guess in your mind its more realistic for a highschool student to go around stopping people's death like a super hero
The story is working through what it means to save others and the reasons why you'd do that and the reasons why you wouldn't and the value in life.
Exactly. A good story is an argument and it's complete once the argument is fully expressed. It doesn't matter if they technically could have made created new unrelated arguments and continued endlessly. It has a specific goal and a specific set of arguments that it carries out. Once that's done, and if the writer is serious about their work, it needs to end. Every little question or "what if" doesn't need to be (and shouldn't be) answered.The story is working through what it means to save others and the reasons why you'd do that and the reasons why you wouldn't and the value in life. It has used Satsuki, the President, and Komachi throughout to give perspectives, with each of them having a flawed approach.
Komachi views death as a matter of trading off of who deserves it, that, if someone is to die, that means someone needs to deserve that death and, if it's not those around her, like Seocchi would view it, then it must be her. The President looks at the world as filled with people who earn death through their actions so it becomes incumbent upon him to bring that to pass for them. Satsuki sees death as something which is her responsibility so, if she fails to prevent it, she should consume herself with guilt.
Komacchi is shown to be wrong because death isn't about deserving. We all add and we all bring a benefit to the world so, instead of thinking of who's deserving, we can think of what can be down. The President is shown to be wrong in that, bringing about death as a punishment, he puts himself in the position of those he sees deserving of death and inevitably just brings about more death, including, ultimately, her own. And Satsuki is shown to be wrong in that of course it's not all on her. Even tho death is something to be fought against, it's not something any of us need to take on all by themself.
And the plot is constructed to show these perspectives and show them to be wrong, and, in the end, it was able to say that and all of its moving parts found their homes.
So, like, to continue from here would be to just iteratively continue to show variations on those perspectives without really saying much more about them and the moving pieces which the plot brought to a close would have to be put back into motion, again, iteratively. By doing it again and again ad infinitum, it weakens the resolution of all of these parts of it leaving the story as less than the sum of its parts.
Every story ends, and that's a good thing.
Exactly. A good story is an argument and it's complete once the argument is fully expressed. It doesn't matter if the could have made new arguments and continued endlessly. It had a specific goal and a specific set of arguments and it carried them out. That's where it ends. Every little question or "what if" doesn't need to be (and shouldn't be) answered.
Yes, because Satsuki is approaching death from a mindset of personal guilt which the narrative calls her on repeatedly.Not much of a valid argument because Satsuki slid back and forth on this principle MULTIPLE TIMES
Again, the problem is that it would just keep looking at the same wrong approaches to death without having much more to say about them making the whole thing thematically weaker. Did you not read the post you were responding to?Also, how the fuck does my scenario of going into the medical field... not apply when this is exactly what would be happening.
Hoping the extras give us some of that.Amazing comic, not enough Yuri though
Your arguments for why it should continue are what's not really developed. Your suggestions are not related to the main themes of the story. You even brought up another completely unrelated and thematically different series as an example, with this idea of Satsuki and Komachi working with the professor to understand their abilities. That's not what this series was or is about. At this point we have a fundamentally different understanding of story writing and I can't bridge that gap here.It should be if it fits the original theme and would be interesting. And so far I haven't heard a good argument as to why it wouldn't be other than... "original story done, we end now because good enough."
Yes, because Satsuki is approaching death from a mindset of personal guilt which the narrative calls her on repeatedly.
Again, the problem is that it would just keep looking at the same wrong approaches to death without having much more to say about them making the whole thing thematically weaker. Did you not read the post you were responding to?
ignoring the part where u literally walk up to classmates and tell them ur going to die you gonna ignore that part too?...Yes, he did. You're forgetting that reason he didn't kill more people is because Satsuki was stopping him.
Also, please do something like poisoning someone and when arrested for it try the legal defense of, "Well, yeah, but I didn't kill them DIRECTLY." Because one of the things Prez tried was that. And Satsuki stopped him.
Not letting people die = being a superhero.
I guess the next time someone is choking on their food and needs someone to do the Heimlich Maneuver, I'll just look on and not doing anything because that's superhero shit and I can't be involved in that.
CPR? Superhero shit. And I'm not wearing a cape.
Your arguments for why it should continue are what's not really developed. Your suggestions are not related to the main ideas of the story.
You even brought up another completely unrelated and totally different series as an example, with this idea of Satsuki and Komachi working with the professor to understand their abilities. That's not what this series was or is about. At this point we have a fundamentally different understanding of story writing and I can't bridge that gap here.