Yuri-Drill - Vol. 3 - One Page Shorts by Kodama Naoko
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Messages
- 1,498
The author is quite the optimist uh...
Well, theoretically(and some experiments have shown promising results) it is possible for same-sex couples to have children(genetically speaking), but there are some things to consider, depending on the method used.
If we take a female-female couple as a example, one of the methods used would limit the child's gender to always be female, since the cromossomes would always be xx, and to make a male child, it would take a xy variation, which is non existent in this case.
Now, other possible method would allow both genders, but it would be a little tricky since it consisted in altering some layers of the egg so the fertilization of another egg would be possible.
Still, even if it the most efficient method was already decided by the scientific/medical community and properly tested, this would not be cheap at all, I guarantee. Just the usual artificial insemination is already expensive. A new method like this would be way higher in its price, so those who actually chosen to do it probably would be people who either worked pretty hard for it or were already rich.
So no worries, guys. Men wont be obsolete or anything crazy like that. Lets all keep in mind that there were a bunch of folks whom gone nuts when the (commom) artificial insemination was annouced, all saying that people would just stop having children "the normal way" because of it, screaming non sense like "the end of times". Lo and behold, we all know that this isnt the truth, and they were nothing more than crazy nutjobs.
Note: No, it would not and it wont ever be possible by the scientific community to allow someone to self impregnate. Its antiethical in all its extremes and no one would do it and lose their entire carreer. So, no one can use this argument as a justification to block said research for same-sex couples.
If we take a female-female couple as a example, one of the methods used would limit the child's gender to always be female, since the cromossomes would always be xx, and to make a male child, it would take a xy variation, which is non existent in this case.
Now, other possible method would allow both genders, but it would be a little tricky since it consisted in altering some layers of the egg so the fertilization of another egg would be possible.
Still, even if it the most efficient method was already decided by the scientific/medical community and properly tested, this would not be cheap at all, I guarantee. Just the usual artificial insemination is already expensive. A new method like this would be way higher in its price, so those who actually chosen to do it probably would be people who either worked pretty hard for it or were already rich.
So no worries, guys. Men wont be obsolete or anything crazy like that. Lets all keep in mind that there were a bunch of folks whom gone nuts when the (commom) artificial insemination was annouced, all saying that people would just stop having children "the normal way" because of it, screaming non sense like "the end of times". Lo and behold, we all know that this isnt the truth, and they were nothing more than crazy nutjobs.
Note: No, it would not and it wont ever be possible by the scientific community to allow someone to self impregnate. Its antiethical in all its extremes and no one would do it and lose their entire carreer. So, no one can use this argument as a justification to block said research for same-sex couples.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
- Messages
- 46
Page 3! I hope that future is nearer than what we thought! Possibility is endless since we humans still has not comprehend most knowledge out there that could help in this kind of situation!
Also am hoping to see same-sex couples walking around like normal couples in the future!
Also am hoping to see same-sex couples walking around like normal couples in the future!
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
- Messages
- 1,736
Pg.3 it sure is nice if that's the case.
The Ethics committee won't be happy about this though. Because they're probably going to say something along the lines of "child making gone wrong, big suffer" or "they may think that child is pet"
Annd yes I did messed up the grammar for the sake of mocking and simplicity. Either way, if we don't try, we'll never get anywhere. Even so, it will indeed require a massive amount of care. Starting with learning epigenetics and children development during pregnancy.
The Ethics committee won't be happy about this though. Because they're probably going to say something along the lines of "child making gone wrong, big suffer" or "they may think that child is pet"
Annd yes I did messed up the grammar for the sake of mocking and simplicity. Either way, if we don't try, we'll never get anywhere. Even so, it will indeed require a massive amount of care. Starting with learning epigenetics and children development during pregnancy.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
- Messages
- 1,736
@Madance that's not nessecary the case, you see... even though the human body may sometimes appear as specific genders, the body itself is comprised of cells with different dnas, given it may be a different percentage of the mixture between the two dnas. Also, female subjects are known to have more genetically diverse dnas throughout the body. Giving birth to children that looks unrelated or tested to seem inrelated, but then again... you gotta look for specific organs that contains the specific dnas.
More details on that I suggest you watch some videos relating to that topic.
More details on that I suggest you watch some videos relating to that topic.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2018
- Messages
- 9,454
oh?
