A scene that's meant to be cool looked stupid to me because the guy literally just appeared out of nowhere with an explanation only added afterwards, I made a joke.
An explanation that, in your own word, you couldn't understand. So I doubt you really knew it was explained when you made that 'joke'.
Also you:
Doesn't really change my point that much,
sure that is a somewhat reasonable explanation, but also so goddamn contrived
"He kinda just spawned there" might as well be the actual explanation
If you didn't decide to be defensive first and go 'yeah I don't know what's going on so I just made a joke' maybe I'd believe you.
Right now everything you say to me just look like excuses for being 'wrong'.
The version I know of is "Every introduced story element should have a purpose, if you describe a gun in someones office that gun should get fired throughout the course of the story"
Which, if you'd notice, doesn't say when/how it's to be used, that it only does.
And what was your reply to me showing him saying he'll be back?
And no the scene you linked to doesn't count because this is a day after, but nowhere in chapter 8 did he say he would come the day after, only that he would come soon.
So to you chekov's gun has to be...predictable?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
You are the dumbass who took a joke as "take" you needed to correct with your oh so better opinion that isn't even factually correct.
the only joke here is your ego
Well, I CAN read the RAW (has been, finished the WN before this whole translation started even)
So my initial correction was, in fact, factually correct unlike you who admitted you couldn't even read.
So what does that make your ego at? Flat earther?
p.s. Ignore button is a thing if my replies are enraging you that much.