Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2018
- Messages
- 1,362
We should talk about this. Specifically about the reaction that's been had here, and how that's a worrying sign due to the time, effort, and rage in this situation.
The choice was made to lash out at people you don't even know, and spend your energy attacking them. This is not the behavior of an adult, these are not the actions of someone in a healthy mental state. I'm not saying this to attack you or to insult you; I'm trying to clarify where I'm coming from and to say that you need to really think hard about what caused this outburst of rage.
I'm going to state this again: I am not trying to attack, insult, demean, or degrade you. I am being genuine when I say this worries me, and I want to take the chance to call out the behavior so that it can be considered.
Finally, to your point that you made: I cannot speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself. When I functionally "downvoted" your post, it wasn't entirely due to your critique of the use "scum" (although it is worth noting there's nothing to suggest the author or TL's use of scum doesn't fall into exactly the meaning of the word, so I don't personally think your post is correct). My main issue with your post was that, like your reply here, it was an instant attack against someone for no real reason. No one was harmed in the making of this manga, no one needs to be "fired". Even if they HAD used a word incorrectly, that was not a reasonable and measured way to critique someone's work, especially when we are talking about a freely-posted, freely read piece of fan media.
TL;DR - The reactions being shown are out of proportion to any actual slight or harm that has occurred. Taking time to measure a reply, and to think through the implications of what someone is saying or doing, is a more mature and wiser state of action.
Far from an instant reaction it's a frustration long buried finding an expression over a series I'm slowly developing much affection for. I typed out several versions before settling on the simplicity of bombastic hyperbole.Thank you, Superpeanut, for saying this, as it is aligned with my feelings on the matter as well.
Since you've basically said all that, I'll then go a step further and use the time I was going to put towards responding initially to address the usage of scum itself. "Scum" on its own does, in fact, have its own negative connotations towards people; the equating of "scum" (as in the unwanted, stinky frothy foam skimmed from the top of a soup or broth or other liquid) to "the lowest class of humanity" dates back to the late 16th century; it's most likely that this is due to the use of "dregs", referring to the unwanted sediment left after fermentation of liquor, in a negative sense (as in "useless residue, the most worthless part"), in the early 16th century, and both terms having fairly similar concepts that they are considered synonymous, such that "dregs of humanity" and "scum of humanity" are saying the same thing.
Additionally, "scumbag" is actually derived separately but from similar connotations, referring originally to coarse-woven fabric bags used for straining sugar, in the 19th century; and then eventually this was applied to condoms, with semen being treated as the scum- yes, condoms were referred to as "scum bags" in the early 20th century, which was then derogatorily used as reference to people themselves, popularized by Frank Zappa, John Lennon, and Yoko Ono's song of the same name made at Fillmore East in 1971, with Frank Zappa even saying that the song only has "two words" and they're "scum bag", rather than the fused singular word that we use today.
So, even if the reaction that I (and possibly others; I won't speak for them) had wasn't due to the overly harsh reaction of telling Black Beat to "fire their proofreader because they didn't speak English", it would still have been warranted to indicate that it was wrong to say that scum was used incorrectly.
Other than mild pertubance my mental state is fine thankyou, that yuou think it an act of "rage" speaks more for your tendencies towards projection.
What led to my second post was that not one of you were willing to actually reply to my post and express what you felt was wrong with my words, you merely "reacted" at me for daring to make a thoughtcrime. I had to actively call you out to get any sort of interaction at all.
"that Scum" is clearly incorrect for actual english usage, to claim otherwise is ridiculous. It follows the same common grammatical errors you see such as "those trashes" or "our staffs" with its origin clearly from english as second language (ESL) users who proliferate such bad usage without correction.
To be clear since I presume you will hang onto this unless I take time to clearly point this out. but this isn't some attack on those learning english.