Tensei Coliseum: Saijaku Skill de Saikyou no Onna-tachi o Koryaku Shite Dorei Harem Tsukurimasu - Ch. 36

[Zen44]

I've spelt it out for you over and over again. You not liking something is whatever, it's the fact that you tried to act morally superior over it that's the issue here. If you're not into bratty stuff, sure, move on. But you can't claim it's pedophilia or somehow immoral while not complaining about everything else too. If fictional characters (who are above 18 here, mind you) getting lewded if pedophilia to you, despite only being drawings, then all the rape and sex slavery should also offend you, if it doesn't, that means rape and sex slavery doesn't bother you, because you've already made it clear that it being fictional doesn't change the fact that it's immoral to you in other conditions, therefore you are fine with girls getting raped and sold into sex slavery as long as they look over 18.

I've made it as clear as possible, everyone else seems to understand, if you still don't get it, maybe you need to realize that you might just be very stupid.

I haven't even used the fact that you didn't even remember the fact that the literal MC of this manga is just 15 years old, which was made clear at the literal begining. That didn't seem to bother you until I pointed it out. Even if you claim to have forgotten, why didn't you immediately drop it when you first read this manga whenever you started? The mangaka was very clear what the character's age was and what kind of manga this was going to be?

For your own sanity and to save yourself from further humiliation, I would suggest shutting up in this comment section, unless of course you have a humiliation fetish, in which case I would suggest someone else since I have no interest in helping you in your perversion.

I can choose what I can and can't complain about. Why do you even care so much? The rape and sex slavery stuff doesn't bother me because I've seen other works with stuff like that in them and I know it's not real. Sexual loli stuff is just disturbing to me. Honestly, it's not that complex.

I already told you it was because I haven't read the first chapter of the manga in years. Please, read my previous responses. Also, I already admitted twice that I messed up about Mikagami's age, but I guess you missed that.

Okay bro, whatever helps you stop talking to me.

 

[RanmaChaos]

Thanks for the chapter

 

[orion313]

Honestly, I think Mikagami is going to lose this. They set up way to much, evidently picking their opponent, doing what they can to get the weakest combatants they can get, the enemy sponsors name is literally "stupid" alongside everyone thinking low of her. I feel it's a big set up to subvert and pivot the story.

That or... nothing different happens, and we repeat the same formula.

Point is, I feel we are due for a shake up via loss. Personally, I think it would have been more interesting if the merchant won, but thats because we got a good insight to him. Maybe Sapphire will be revealed as an interesting character?

Also, seems we're getting set up for Zule betraying/leaving Mikagami? At least, if im understanding what she said correctly.

 

[Gothic_Catalyst]

Thank you for the chapter.

 

[Darklight99]

I can choose what I can and can't complain about. Why do you even care so much? The rape and sex slavery stuff doesn't bother me because I've seen other works with stuff like that in them and I know it's not real. Sexual loli stuff is just disturbing to me. Honestly, it's not that complex.

I already told you it was because I haven't read the first chapter of the manga in years. Please, read my previous responses. Also, I already admitted twice that I messed up about Mikagami's age, but I guess you missed that.

Okay bro, whatever helps you stop talking to me.

Why didn't you stop reading it day 1 when you first started it though? Sure, you forgot, but you did read once.
And no matter what you say, you admit that rape is not an issue for you while also admitting that you cannot differentiate between reality and fiction.

 

[Pauan]

We're doing the "child looking adult" shtick again? The author is certainly a weirdo. I'll just skip any sex scenes involving them.

Edit: I don't get why a bunch of people are upset that I'm calling out the author for adding in characters who look like 10 year olds in a manga where the losers get screwed by the winner.

Ohhh, I get it! It's about the appearance of the women!

https://jpop.fandom.com/wiki/Nagasawa_Marina

This is Nagasawa Marina. She is 30 years old, but she looks like a child.

According to you, she should not be allowed to date or marry, because that would be "pedophilia" (which you said is worse than rape and sex slavery).

You believe that women should not have agency over their own bodies, and that only you have the right to decide if she looks "old enough" to be worthy of sex.

This is the year 2025, body shaming women and taking away their agency is extremely misogynistic, and it is a hate crime.

Judging women based on appearance is incredibly cringe and morally wrong.

This is why the pedophilia laws do not mention appearance at all, they are based only on age and nothing else.

A woman having a certain body type is not a crime. Men liking women with a certain body type is also not a crime.

 

[Zen44]

Ohhh, I get it! It's about the appearance of the women!

https://jpop.fandom.com/wiki/Nagasawa_Marina

This is Nagasawa Marina. She is 30 years old, but she looks like a child.

According to you, she should not be allowed to date or marry, because that would be "pedophilia" (which you said is worse than rape and sex slavery).

You believe that women should not have agency over their own bodies, and that only you have the right to decide if she looks "old enough" to be worthy of sex.

This is the year 2025, body shaming women and taking away their agency is extremely misogynistic, and it is a hate crime.

Judging women based on appearance is incredibly cringe and morally wrong.

This is why the pedophilia laws do not mention appearance at all, they are based only on age and nothing else.

A woman having a certain body type is not a crime. Men liking women with a certain body type is also not a crime.

No, she's an actual person. If she showed ID with her age on it and wasn't using her appearance for pedo bait then I'm not going to gaf who she dated or whatever. She can't help her appearance. An author can choose what their characters look like and how they plan to use them in their stories.

I'm not going to keep debating with you guys over lolicon nonsense

 

[Zen44]

Why didn't you stop reading it day 1 when you first started it though? Sure, you forgot, but you did read once.
And no matter what you say, you admit that rape is not an issue for you while also admitting that you cannot differentiate between reality and fiction.

Bro, idgaf anymore to continue this convo. We'll just keep saying the same shit to each other over and over again and it'll get us nowhere. Please just stop talking to me.

 

[Darklight99]

Bro, idgaf anymore to continue this convo. We'll just keep saying the same shit to each other over and over again and it'll get us nowhere. Please just stop talking to me.

Rape apologist says what

 

[MangaDexGreyrat]

When do we get to the big lady, and can it hurry up? I want the big lady.

 

[Zen44]

Rape apologist says what

Yeah, you're just trolling. You can keep using that term, but anime characters aren't real, so sorry that I only care about rape and other sexually violent things happening to real people. I'm done. I'm not responding to whatever you say anymore loli lover.

 

[Imgoated]

We're doing the "child looking adult" shtick again? The author is certainly a weirdo. I'll just skip any sex scenes involving them.

Edit: I don't get why a bunch of people are upset that I'm calling out the author for adding in characters who look like 10 year olds in a manga where the losers get screwed by the winner.

Maybe because it just does not make sense to put moral agency on a fictional characters?

 

[Zen44]

Maybe because it just does not make sense to put moral agency on a fictional characters?

My problem isn't with the characters themselves. It's with the author. I don't blame the characters looking the way they do. I just find it weird that the author felt the need to add in characters that look like 10 year olds in a story like this.

 

[Darklight99]

Yeah, you're just trolling. You can keep using that term, but anime characters aren't real, so sorry that I only care about rape and other sexually violent things happening to real people. I'm done. I'm not responding to whatever you say anymore loli lover.

rape apologist and sex slavery apologist, how low can one get

 

[Jadeite_McSwag]

If the woman in the sailor fuku is Mary why does Zulu ask "Mary's idea?" to her, as if it was someone else Mary dressed up? Typo or...?

In Japanese sometimes they talk in third person like that. She's basically asking "Was this your idea?"

But I don't understand what she is referring to when she is talking about cross-dressing before??? Mistranslation?? Or am I missing something from some chapter?

 

[Pauan]

No, she's an actual person. If she showed ID with her age on it and wasn't using her appearance for pedo bait then I'm not going to gaf who she dated or whatever. She can't help her appearance. An author can choose what their characters look like and how they plan to use them in their stories.

I'm not going to keep debating with you guys over lolicon nonsense

You are the one who said that it's the appearance that matters, not the age. You specifically said "child looking adult".

If a woman is 12 years old but looks like she's 30, that's still pedophilia, even though she doesn't look like a child.

Drawings don't have an age, because they don't exist, it's fictional, it's not a person. Which means drawings can never be pedophilia, because pedophilia is based on AGE, not appearance.

But you keep incorrectly trying to claim that it's about appearance, which means you are body shaming women. You are saying that certain body types are "wrong" and that it's "wrong" for men to like those body types.

Your beliefs are incredibly weird, that's not how the law works, and that's not how morality works. All of the psychologists and scientists disagree with you:

https://www.treatmyocd.com/what-is-...does-it-mean-im-a-pedophile-a-therapists-view

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130111326.htm

The Supreme Court also disagrees with you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition

Pedophilia is wrong because harming actual children is wrong. Protecting adults who look like children is incredibly weird.

Protecting fictional drawings is even more weird, because drawings don't have feelings, they cannot be harmed.

 

[Pauan]

My problem isn't with the characters themselves. It's with the author. I don't blame the characters looking the way they do. I just find it weird that the author felt the need to add in characters that look like 10 year olds in a story like this.

So you don't have an issue with the author choosing to make rape, drugs, and sex slavery a core part of the manga?

But the author choosing to have a wide variety of body types and personalities to cater to different preferences is where you draw the line?

 

[BananaBonanza]

We're doing the "child looking adult" shtick again? The author is certainly a weirdo. I'll just skip any sex scenes involving them.

Edit: I don't get why a bunch of people are upset that I'm calling out the author for adding in characters who look like 10 year olds in a manga where the losers get screwed by the winner.

The absolute stupidity and audacity to come into this forum under this manga and say this idiotic and ignorant shit was truly baffling enough to compel me to make an account just to respond to you. To come in here and criticize THIS TYPE of manga for the content that it contains is so astronomically stupid. Not only is it such a common trope within anime in general, it's also super normal and has been a constant trope since the beginning of the media. You have no right to make conclusions about an author's character based upon a trope they use in their manga.

You shouldn't even be in the anime community. Normie shit as mainstream as My Hero Academia has sexualized minor characters. That's just a given, but obviously Horikoshi is a respected member of society and the industry. You have no right as a consumer to criticize something so prominent. You even have this sort of sexualization in media like Pokemon with cards that depicted Misty sexually. It's ultimately engrained in this medium and we don't need you fucking moral pigs coming in here to dictate what is and isn't okay. You shouldn't be here consuming this, and I can't believe you made it this far when you hate the author.

Zunta, the artist, is a fucking sweetheart on Twitter. You wanna call him weird? Wanna call someone with so much more potential as an individual weird because he draws some sexy loli character for a manga? You're delusional into thinking this content has any reflection on reality.

 

[Salfaro]

Not looking forward to a loli+shota joining the harem, but oh well. Maybe they'll find some way to brush them off to the side.

 

[wasd3307]

I don't think it's that hard to understand though. You guys are really over complicating something that is a big nothing burger. I think I've made it obvious that I don't care about fantasy rape between two adults, but anything sexual involving kids is a no go to me.

Your first comment made you come across as one of those insufferables from twitter so of course people will react somewhat aggressively. And your last point is precisely why it doesn't make sense, if you simply didn't like it that's ok, nobdy can force you to like or look at something after all, but to comment it and announce to the comment section not only makes you sound like one of those twitter hypocrits it also comes across as virtue signaling, like you're only stating it to feel superior over others.