Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2019
- Messages
- 1,545
The Act Age guy is the author not the illustrator of the manga.why would anyone in their right mind rehire the act age guy of all people. did everyone else who could draw die?
The Act Age guy is the author not the illustrator of the manga.why would anyone in their right mind rehire the act age guy of all people. did everyone else who could draw die?
The Act-Age author isn't even the worst person in this case, the other one was even worse.why would anyone in their right mind rehire the act age guy of all people. did everyone else who could draw die?
Except he didn't pay the price, his sentence was just 1 year and even that was suspended. All he got was basically a slap on the wrist. Reform is cool and all but you can't just expect to waltz back into your previous job especially a public facing one without any push back. Go work in another industry that isn't public facing or something if you actually do feel remorse for your actions.This is ridiculous. If someone was found guilty for something and paid the price for it, that's the end of it. Let them work and contribute to society. Reform is the whole point of it. Otherwise every single crime should end in death penalty
Thanks for posting the link. JESUS this sounds bad. Hope people go to jail for this shit.Since you can't click on a image here's the link about what happened
https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/16403350
From what I understand, Act Age guy doesn't draw? He was a writer on that one, so, like, why? There are so many OTHER people trying to make stuff, why that guy? I swear....why would anyone in their right mind rehire the act age guy of all people. did everyone else who could draw die?
Sounds like they did care, atleast in the second case where they went through extra steps to verify reform. Either way though, once ppl are punished youve gotta work to integrate them back into society and reform them or you just get recidivism and more victims.Why am I not surprised that the higher-ups of the publishing company don't give a fuck if a fucker is found guilty of rape?
Bet if you dig just a little bit, you will find the shit they themselves did and do.
Now everyone that isn't depraved sicko has to suffer because they can't see other people as more than objects.
Except he didn't pay the price, his sentence was just 1 year and even that was suspended. All he got was basically a slap on the wrist. Reform is cool and all but you can't just expect to waltz back into your previous job especially a public facing one without any push back. Go work in another industry that isn't public facing or something if you actually do feel remorse for your actions.
The price is determined by the law, not by any one person's moral compass. Once the law determined what had to be paid and it was served, that's that. It's the whole reason why it exists. If it should be higher, then the law should be amended. That makes the whole reaction unreasonable and affects people completely unrelated to the initial incident.for those saying "he paid his price to society":
1. no he didn't, he served barely any time
2. he can go work in a field that isn't public-facing. he and his editors obviously knew that people would hate it, which is why they tried to hide it. it's nepotism and entitlement
if he opened a restaurant, would you say that people NEED to buy his food and that it's unfair to choose not to support him because of the rapes he did?