Aren't you applying your own morals and values on to someone else? We do not know what Rosa was taught. All we know is that Rosa sadistically enjoyed making a little girl suffer years of abuse and torture after being told the Aria's mother made Rosa suffer.
No? I'm saying that Rosa applied what she was taught. And that we do know what she was taught- as you just said, she enjoyed torturing Aria
because was told that Aria's mother made Rosa suffer. That's a early stage moral development. "Good thing because it rewards me, bad thing because it punishes me." We're dancing around terms when we actually agree.
And where did I ever state that Rosa should suffer terminal punishment? I said that Rosa should suffer some punishment for her actions, but no where did I ever state that she should spend the rest of her life in prison, be executed, or suffer trauma from being abused in some way. I stated that I was satisfied with her sort stay in her isolated jail cell, and that I hoped that she would become a better person when she grows up.
You didn't, nor did I say you did. I offered a hypothetical example of the logical extreme. I agreed that Rosa should suffer
some punishment for her actions, but I stated they should be designed to teach her empathy and higher-level morals, rather than strictly punish her terminally. Punishment for the sake of punishment is cruel, and it leads to recidivism. Again, we're dancing around terms when we actually agree.
It was more of a general statement to everyone else - and I said almost absolves. You (in this thread), and others (in this and previous chapter threads), have been either advocating that Rosa is too young to be punished (because she is too young to know what she is doing), or that her punishment is so traumatic that she suddenly became a reformed person and turned on her mother that treated her like a princess all this time. Being isolated in a jail cell for a short time will not traumatize a person enough to turn on their own mother. Yet, by advocating that such a short amount of time is traumatizing enough for a sadistic narcissist, it is almost like absolving what she did. Because what Rosa went through in such a short amount of time is nothing compared to what Aria went through.
I never said that Rosa is too young to be punished because she is too young to know what she is doing. I said that her punishment should be designed to teach her why what she did was wrong. I think her punishment is not over- she's going to live a humble life in an orphanage, where before she lived a life of excessive wealth.
I did say that her punishment so far was not enough to reform her and make her turn on her mother. I suggested that perhaps her response to the punishment so far is not based on reforming her, but on her applying the same infantile logic of punishment/reward against her mother.
The term you use, "almost resolving," means "not absolving." Which we agree on. But the crux of the disagreement here is whether or not children are fully culpable for the wrongs they commit. I'm saying no, children are more susceptible to their external conditions than adults. Rosa was encouraged to torture Aria because her criminal Mother rewarded her for doing so. Aria was a victim, and so was Rosa. Aria was the worse victim, and now it's Rosa's time to reap her just deserts. From now on Aria is looking at all rewards, and Rosa is looking at all consequences. Give it a few years, and I bet Aria thinks, "I got off easier than Rosa did." Aria just got superpowers!
Am I advocating that Rosa should be tortured, no. But I am saying that Rosa did not endure enough to count as an actual punishment, and she especially did not endure enough to completely betray her own mother like she did.
That's two different questions. Is Rosa's current punishment enough? Rosa is about to live in an orphanage. Not many orphanages receive the funding to provide full meals and an easy life. Compared to her life before, this is worse. That's torture. Being subjected to worse conditions is torture.
Then the second question is, why did Rosa turn on her Mother? Is it because she did or didn't endure enough to betray her? I don't think it's because she spent a night or two in a cell. I suggested that it's the same logic she used to hurt Aria. "Bad people get hurt, so this is good to do." I guess the phrase you use, "did not endure enough to completely betray her own mother" implies that there is a standard where sufficient suffering would justify the betrayal. And I ask you, what is that limit? How would you punish a child who was taught to harm another child by her criminal mother?
Again, I think we're dancing around terms when we mostly agree. You've said Rosa doesn't deserve jail forever, and I agree. Is it a few more more months or years in jail, before she goes to an orphanage?