Kou 1 Desu ga Isekai de Joushu Hajimemashita - Vol. 7 Ch. 47

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
5,620
Honestly, the debate was basically over the moment the guy tried to put down Hiroto's example from his local area.

Any competent lord would've question if the guy just dismiss an issue from another lord like this, will he do the same if their own place has some 'local issue' in the future.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Sep 11, 2018
Messages
20
Man, one more chapter and they fill it with talk-no-jutsu. Sure, it's a debate, but the enemy was simply using logical fallacies and slander.
Yea, you have no idea how much I was getting confused translating it too lmao.

Keigo tends to bury what someone is actually accusing the other person of underneath layers of wording. So I'm sitting here trying to figure it out. There were definitely moments where I was rereading thinking, "Wait, am I translating this wrong, or what?" and "I swear he just explained what part he was against."
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 30, 2018
Messages
4,963
If one are an arrogant, slimy git with no understanding of how local issues define good governance, then you don't deserve to be governor of this provenience handling several areas' local issues.
Lord Feuillet is an arrogant, slimy git with no understanding of how local issues define good governance.
Therefore, he doesn't deserve to be governor of this provenience handling several areas' local issues.
Q.E.D. Motherf-cker!

I like that Hitoro used his former corrupt ally as an example of atonement and repentance for the other lords.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 2, 2018
Messages
14,355
Man, one more chapter and they fill it with talk-no-jutsu. Sure, it's a debate, but the enemy was simply using logical fallacies and slander.
That’s just how politics work. Discrediting your enemies by pointing out what they disagreed at as a negative for the “common good” is a strategy. Borderline slander and moronic, but it’s parliamentary.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
492
"When your subordinates screw up it's your fault, when mine do is irrelevant."
"You didn't not say X, which means you said Y, right?"
"Adding nuance and exceptions to X means you hate X."
"If you care for the rights of minorities, you're neglecting the majority."
"I'll attack your private life to prove that you'll be bad at your job."

Honestly, I found the debate more realistic than I expected. While Feuillet was obviously set up for a defeat, he was more articulate than I expected, and all his points and tactics have been used in real life too, often to great effect.

Thanks for the translation, it can't have been easy with so much talk-no-jutsu.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Messages
869
Excelis hardly said anything. I suppose that's what happens when one party is busy attacking another and you're left in the background.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top