Mairimashita! Iruma-kun - Ch. 463 - Delivery

[myhusbandisapineapple]

HENRI, SAVE OUR BOY, PLEASE!!!! YOU KNOW YOU WANT THE ROMANCE BETWEEN YOUR DAUGHTER AND IRUMA!!!!

 

[UncleKaos]

that guy got a stick up in his butt. "6 days we kick you out. " he walks like a nazi and sleeps like one
Henri:... disgusting. doesn't destroy the letter but makes copies of it inside his head and plans to stop the nazi demon

 

[AceJc]

I need next chapterssssss right nowwwwwwww

 

[Haunted-Flame]

I feel like it's gonna be a recording of the misfits class performance during the music festival or something like that.

 

[GipsyD]

They just loooove these short-ass cliffhanger chapters huh


I'm joking, authors and artists please take your time crafting your story

 

[radstylix]

What is this cliffhanger bro, ahhhhh

Imagine if the song playing is Irumi though. If Iruma became Irumi there is no problem lol

I thought Ameri's package was gonna be the manga, and we'll finally have some links between the Manga and uh, Ameri's mom (forgot her name atm).

 

[Shinobu]

Its the opening theme to Doraemon

 

[SoyYoJoder]

I bet on Henry playing along with the border patrol until the proper time comes.

 

[Tedonator]

Keep in mind what he's saying no letter or anything will pass through inspection, however Iruma already has a loop hole through Kalego. It might be possible to hand him letters and whatever when summoned as Iruma could probably get Opera to make the summoning sign then unsummon him with the contents in hand or at the very least can tell Kalego of what he wants to say to the others

 

[Wowkin]

“No human remains must exist in the demon world”

Bro it’s demon ink on a demon paper chill the fuck out

It could break the memory erasure spell

 

[Cats-dogs21]

It could break the memory erasure spell

It has not been proven at this time that the memory erasure spell can be broken.

 

[rogpete]

She Rickrolled him.

 

[ThrystaVindr]

I actually really liked the CD demon lol, that was cute

 

[NotSomeone]

I want to believe he told her the entire letter's contents. I have faith in future father-in-law.

He's 100% doing something I don't believe he isn't trying to move a few pieces in Iruma's favor.

 

[asdfasdfasdf]

which makes appeals to universal human rights but has been interpreted to only be legally applicable to US citizens

This is an inaccurate statement. The U.S. Constitution applies to all U.S. territories. The reason Guantanamo Bay can bypass U.S. procedures to some extent is that it is technically not a U.S. territory.

the right to free speech is still applicable for imprisoned people in the US, so prisons are not allowed to interfere with prisoners communicating with people outside.

Not exactly. The right to free speech is often misunderstood; it protects individuals from government restrictions on speech but doesn’t apply to other entities. Businesses can legally limit the speech of their employees in a professional context, and private prisons can do the same. Things get a bit murky when it comes to government-run prisons.

 

[draxdeveloper]

No Nishi, why make me sad at 01 am

 

[ArcLife]

 

[kikix12]

This is an inaccurate statement. The U.S. Constitution applies to all U.S. territories. The reason Guantanamo Bay can bypass U.S. procedures to some extent is that it is technically not a U.S. territory.


Not exactly. The right to free speech is often misunderstood; it protects individuals from government restrictions on speech but doesn’t apply to other entities. Businesses can legally limit the speech of their employees in a professional context, and private prisons can do the same. Things get a bit murky when it comes to government-run prisons.

It's not really getting murky for government prisons.

Free speech allows you to speak. It doesn't guarantee that your message will be delivered remotely to a distant place.

People seem to not understand that transporting messages (eg. a letter, or keeping a phone service) is not part of speech. It's part of a delivery job. And free speech in the constitution does not warrant access to a delivery person, nor does it prevent the government from taking away access to such delivery people. Therefore you may be allowed to speak and write letters, but no one needs to accomodate you and pass on what you spoke or wrote to anyone else.
Therefore your family, to be guaranteed having the ability to receive your message, must be within an earshot of where you are in the prison at the time.

Literally every divergence from this has nothing to do with constitution and everything to do with other laws. If anyone tells you otherwise, then they do not understand English language. Yes, this also applies to courts 'interpretations'. They may be lying, they may be misunderstanding. But in the end, they are simply wrong. Atoms don't stop existing just cause someone said there's nothing smaller than bacteria.

 

[De.Co]

It's a really really good time for the evil cycle Iruma

"Where is Ali-sannnnnn?"

 

[De.Co]

This is an inaccurate statement. The U.S. Constitution applies to all U.S. territories. The reason Guantanamo Bay can bypass U.S. procedures to some extent is that it is technically not a U.S. territory.


Not exactly. The right to free speech is often misunderstood; it protects individuals from government restrictions on speech but doesn’t apply to other entities. Businesses can legally limit the speech of their employees in a professional context, and private prisons can do the same. Things get a bit murky when it comes to government-run prisons.

It's not really getting murky for government prisons.

Free speech allows you to speak. It doesn't guarantee that your message will be delivered remotely to a distant place.

People seem to not understand that transporting messages (eg. a letter, or keeping a phone service) is not part of speech. It's part of a delivery job. And free speech in the constitution does not warrant access to a delivery person, nor does it prevent the government from taking away access to such delivery people. Therefore you may be allowed to speak and write letters, but no one needs to accomodate you and pass on what you spoke or wrote to anyone else.
Therefore your family, to be guaranteed having the ability to receive your message, must be within an earshot of where you are in the prison at the time.

Literally every divergence from this has nothing to do with constitution and everything to do with other laws. If anyone tells you otherwise, then they do not understand English language. Yes, this also applies to courts 'interpretations'. They may be lying, they may be misunderstanding. But in the end, they are simply wrong. Atoms don't stop existing just cause someone said there's nothing smaller than bacteria.

Freedom of speech for prisoners? Pfft, that’s laughable. You’re talking about the USA—a country that attacked Iran right in the middle of negotiations, and the very first thing they did was strike a school. The president of this so-called "powerful" nation is a piece-of-shit pedophile who, on Epstein’s island, would roast children alive and eat them! In violation of international law—and devoid of any morality—they attacked the Dena naval vessel without warning, just for "fun," killing 70 cadets! And that’s not even the half of it—what do you have to say about this wretched country’s ally? Israel has been bombing and killing people for three years now—over 100,000 of them. I couldn't care less if I get banned, but here you are talking about "rights" in America—a country that doesn't even consider the right to life for anyone other than its own citizens.